|Exam Name||:||VoIP Succession 1000/1000M Rls. 3.0 Installation and Maintena|
|Questions and Answers||:||59 Q & A|
|Updated On||:||July 20, 2018|
|PDF Download Mirror||:||[920-138 Download Mirror]|
|Get Full Version||:||Pass4sure 920-138 Full Version|
920-138 exam Dumps Source : VoIP Succession 1000/1000M Rls. 3.0 Installation and Maintena
Test Code : 920-138
Test Name : VoIP Succession 1000/1000M Rls. 3.0 Installation and Maintena
Vendor Name : Nortel
Q&A : 59 Real Questions
Nortel Networks this week plans to unify its legacy and IP telephony items with the latest version of its gadget software.
Succession commercial enterprise utility unencumber three.0 is slated to be unveiled at international connect 2003 in Las Vegas, an adventure backed with the aid of the overseas Nortel Networks Meridian consumer group.
the brand new utility will deliver a standard platform for both Nortel's Succession a thousand IP-PBX and its Meridian 1 PBX, referred to Ann Swenson, senior product marketing supervisor of commercial enterprise IP telephony at Nortel, Brampton, Ontario.
The Succession improve will replace Meridian's X11 gadget utility,now in its twenty fifth liberate,and supply a simplified migration path to IP telephony, Swenson referred to.
"For Meridian consumers accessible, here's an additional demonstration that Nortel is offering an investment-protected direction to new technology," she noted.
With the upgrade, Nortel is also expanding its Succession portfolio with Succession 1000m, which supports as much as 10,000 IP clients per call server. prior to now, the Succession one thousand line supported up to 1,000 IP clients per name server, Swenson spoke of.
free up 3.0 integrates seamlessly with Nortel's Multimedia exchange, a Session Initiation Protocol-based collaboration platform that elements conferencing, customized name screening and video calling.
the brand new multimedia capabilities and simplified migration direction may still provide Meridian 1 customers first rate motives to upgrade, mentioned Mike Olson, senior vp of income and advertising at NextiraOne, an answer provider based mostly in Houston. "naturally, IP telephony is something we're all going to at some element," Olson said.
the new device utility will additionally support Nortel's impending low-end i2001 internet phone, and a brand new survivable small department workplace gateway for 5 to 50 clients, each scheduled for availability later this yr.
free up 3.0 is scheduled for prevalent availability within the fourth quarter. Pricing has not been established.
WASHINGTON -- Nortel Networks (NYSE:NT)(TSX:NT) today introduced that it was the first networking vendor to circulate voice over IP (web Protocol) interoperability checking out for the U.S. protection branch's Joint Interoperability examine Command (JITC) and get hold of the intent to certify. JITC certification trying out is required for all products that help voice, statistics or video communications connecting to the defense Switched network. "Our newest voice over IP analysis concludes that seventy six % of IT executives cost necessities compliance and interoperability as a must-have or very vital," says Robin Gareiss, fundamental research officer for Nemertes research. "Receiving the defense department's voice over IP intent to certify underscores Nortel Networks capacity to tackle this compelling subject among IT professionals throughout all industries. Given the stringent necessities of the defense department for reliability, interoperability, and price-effectiveness, its acceptance of Nortel Networks items validates that voice over IP is at once fitting a mature, dependable technology." "Demonstrating that Nortel Networks portfolio can perform under essentially the most making an attempt situations is important no longer handiest for our defense force customers, however also for corporations requiring secure, professional options which are confirmed to face up to operations beneath worst-case eventualities," referred to Jim Biard, vice president, Federal business, Nortel Networks. The JITC certification process, coordinated through the defense assistance programs agency (DISA), entails an hard routine of gadget and interoperability exams. JITC certification ensures that items are secure, function devoid of performance degradation in a multi-supplier ambiance, possess exacting ranges of resiliency and redundancy to make sure reliability under duress, and offer the entertaining armed forces elements and performance required for country wide security. As a combat assist company, DISA is chargeable for planning, engineering, buying, fielding and aiding world net-centric solutions and operating the international advice Grid to serve the wants of the president, vice president, secretary of defense, joint chiefs of team of workers, combatant commanders, and other defense department components all the way through both battle and peace. The JITC-confirmed voice over IP solution from Nortel Networks comprises:
A CSP's digital transformation includes so a whole lot more than expertise. essential – and sometimes most challenging – is the cultural transformation that goes along with it. As Sigma's Chief know-how Officer, Catherine Michel has extensive event with technology as she leads the company's complete product portfolio and approach. but she's additionally no stranger to merging expertise and subculture, having taken an organization — Tribold — from inception to acquisition (via Sigma in 2013), and she continues to propose carrier providers on the way to pressure their own transformations. This astounding feminine chief and vocal recommend for other girls in the business will be a part of women in Comms for a are living radio exhibit to focus on all things digital transformation, including the cultural transformation that goes together with it.
Nortel Networks (NYSE:NT)(TSX:NT) these days announced that it has been chosen by using constitution Communications, Inc. (Nasdaq:CHTR) to extend voice over information superhighway Protocol (VoIP) service choices in charter's Midwest and terrific Lakes working divisions using Nortel Networks cable VoIP answer featuring Succession conversation Server (CS) 2000-Compact softswitches. This preference, which extends a relationship announced in December 2002, is subject to execution of a definitive settlement.
"we've got rebuilt and upgraded our infrastructure to bring advanced items and functions together with voice over IP," noted Wayne Davis, senior vp, Engineering and Technical Operations, charter. "As such, Nortel Networks has played a strategic role in our packet community transformation, offering a cable voice over IP answer that is very amazing and mature. Their wide advantage of cable telephony, along with a robust heritage in features and professional support, has enabled us to aggressively enter and compete within the telephony market."
As a part of its usual growth, Davis also observed charter intends to install Nortel Networks Multimedia conversation Server (MCS) 5200 in a 2004 market trial, giving both residential and company customers entry to multimedia features impartial of place. the brand new constitution VoIP architecture will encompass the capacity to communicate between a Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) server and a PacketCable(TM) qualified name management Server (CMS), with no trouble bringing the rich world of SIP-based mostly elements to a PacketCable atmosphere.
"Nortel Networks is fundamentally changing interpersonal communications across all markets," pointed out Dan Mondor, well-known manager, global Cable solutions, Nortel Networks. "we now have generated vital momentum in the cable market and proceed to focal point efforts on supplying service-grade cable options that allow providers like charter to pave the way for brand spanking new integrated video, voice, and records features. constitution remains a leader in cable IP telephony and this addition to their features portfolio will help them to drive multiplied revenue alternatives."
To pace time to market and make sure provider grade service for its clients, charter will use Nortel Networks professional capabilities to help the planning and deployment of the VoIP solution.
In September 2002, charter deployed the first commercially purchasable cable VoIP carrier in North america using Nortel Networks device, and has skilled well-nigh no downtime on the softswitch when you consider that launch.
For the entire 12 months and fourth quarter of 2003, Nortel Networks ranked #1 within the world markets for voice over IP ports shipped and in international softswitch revenue, in response to Synergy research community and In-Stat/MDR. Nortel Networks has a proven portfolio of items and functions for packet voice and multimedia features. Nortel Networks is providing Succession VoIP solutions to main operators, including Cox Communications, dash, MCI, TeleCable, Hong Kong Broadband community, Verizon Communications, Bell Canada, Cable & instant Cayman Islands, China Netcom and China Railcom.
Nortel Networks is an business chief and innovator concentrated on remodeling how the area communicates and exchanges counsel. The business is offering its carrier issuer and commercial enterprise customers with communications technology and infrastructure to permit price-added IP facts, voice and multimedia functions spanning instant Networks, Wireline Networks, business Networks, and Optical Networks. As a worldwide company, Nortel Networks does business in more than a hundred and fifty nations. greater counsel about Nortel Networks may also be found on the net at www.nortelnetworks.com or www.nortelnetworks.com/media_center.
certain counsel covered in this press liberate is forward-searching and is field to essential hazards and uncertainties. The outcomes or hobbies anticipated in these statements may additionally range materially from exact results or routine.
factors which may trigger effects or activities to vary from latest expectations encompass, amongst different things: the outcome of Nortel Networks impartial overview and deliberate restatement of its previously announced or filed financial effects; the influence of the management changes announced on April 28, 2004; the have an effect on of the lack of ability to meet Nortel Networks filing tasks on credit and help amenities and public debt tasks; the sufficiency of Nortel Networks restructuring activities, together with the competencies for better precise fees to be incurred in reference to restructuring actions compared to the estimated costs of such movements; continued discounts in spending with the aid of Nortel Networks shoppers; fluctuations in Nortel Networks operating effects and established business, economic and market circumstances and increase quotes; the communique by Nortel Networks auditors of the existence of fabric weaknesses in inner handle; Nortel Networks capacity to recruit and retain qualified personnel; fluctuations in Nortel Networks money stream, stage of spectacular debt and latest debt ratings; Nortel Networks skill to fulfill the economic covenants in its credit score amenities; the use of cash collateral to help Nortel Networks standard direction company actions; the dependence on Nortel Networks subsidiaries for funding; the impact of Nortel Networks defined advantage plans and deferred tax assets on consequences of operations, Nortel Networks cash flows and compliance with economic covenants; Nortel Networks dependence on new product building and its means to predict market demand for specific items; Nortel Networks capability to combine the operations and technologies of received organizations in a superb manner; the have an effect on of fast technological and market trade; the have an effect on of price and product competitors; boundaries to overseas boom and international financial circumstances, specially in emerging markets and including hobby expense and foreign money change expense fluctuations; the have an effect on of rationalization in the telecommunications trade; changes in law of the information superhighway; the impact of the credit score dangers of Nortel Networks consumers and the have an effect on of client financing and commitments; inventory market volatility generally and because of acceleration of the settlement date or early contract of Nortel Networks purchase contracts; dangers linked to a consolidation of Nortel Networks usual shares; the affect of Nortel Networks deliver and outsourcing contracts that include beginning and setting up provisions, which, if not met, might outcomes within the charge of large penalties or liquidated damages; the long run success of Nortel Networks strategic alliances; and the hostile decision of litigation, investigations, intellectual property disputes and equivalent concerns.
For additional information with appreciate to certain of these and other components, see probably the most recent kind 10-Q/A and form 10-k/A filed by Nortel Networks with the united states Securities and alternate fee. except otherwise required via applicable securities laws, Nortel Networks disclaims any intention or responsibility to update or revise any forward-looking statements, even if on account of new advice, future hobbies or otherwise.
Nortel Networks, the Nortel Networks logo, the Globemark, business without Boundaries and Succession are emblems of Nortel Networks. PacketCable is a trademark of Cable television Laboratories, Inc.
920-138 exam Dumps Source : VoIP Succession 1000/1000M Rls. 3.0 Installation and Maintena
Test Code : 920-138
Test Name : VoIP Succession 1000/1000M Rls. 3.0 Installation and Maintena
Vendor Name : Nortel
Q&A : 59 Real Questions
Whilst it is very hard task to choose reliable exam questions / answers resources regarding review, reputation and validity because people get ripoff due to choosing incorrect service. Killexams. com make it certain to provide its clients far better to their resources with respect to exam dumps update and validity. Most of other peoples ripoff report complaint clients come to us for the brain dumps and pass their exams enjoyably and easily. We never compromise on our review, reputation and quality because killexams review, killexams reputation and killexams client self confidence is important to all of us. Specially we manage killexams.com review, killexams.com reputation, killexams.com ripoff report complaint, killexams.com trust, killexams.com validity, killexams.com report and killexams.com scam. If perhaps you see any bogus report posted by our competitor with the name killexams ripoff report complaint internet, killexams.com ripoff report, killexams.com scam, killexams.com complaint or something like this, just keep in mind that there are always bad people damaging reputation of good services due to their benefits. There are a large number of satisfied customers that pass their exams using killexams.com brain dumps, killexams PDF questions, killexams practice questions, killexams exam simulator. Visit Killexams.com, our test questions and sample brain dumps, our exam simulator and you will definitely know that killexams.com is the best brain dumps site.
Killexams HP0-S32 brain dumps | Killexams C5050-300 study guide | Killexams C2010-510 entrance exam | Killexams 1Z0-450 test prep | Killexams C_BOBIP_41 test questions | Killexams 000-385 bootcamp | Killexams 9A0-160 cheat sheets | Killexams MSC-235 bootcamp | Killexams 9A0-058 Practice Test | Killexams 00M-656 free test | Killexams 650-286 practice questions | Killexams HP0-Y17 braindumps | Killexams 70-523-VB cbt | Killexams P2090-032 Practice test | Killexams A2040-985 test questions and answers | Killexams 310-053 mock test | Killexams 310-200 test answers | Killexams 350-026 sample test | Killexams HP2-Z04 practice test | Killexams 050-892 free pdf |
We are normally specifically conscious that an vital problem within the IT business is that there is a nonattendance of enormous well worth dont forget materials. Our exam coaching fabric offers all of you that you need to take an confirmation exam. Our Nortel 920-138 Exam will provide you with examination request with affirmed answers that replicate the real exam. We at killexams.Com are made plans to empower you to clean your 920-138 accreditation check with excessive ratings.
If you are interested in successfully completing the Nortel 920-138 Certification to start earning? killexams.com has leading edge developed Nortel exam questions that will ensure you pass this 920-138 exam! killexams.com delivers you the most accurate, current and latest updated 920-138 Certification exam questions and available with a 100% money back guarantee promise. There are many companies that provide 920-138 brain dumps but those are not accurate and latest ones. Preparation with killexams.com 920-138 new questions is a best way to pass this certification exam in easy way.
We are all well aware that a major problem in the IT industry is that there is a lack of quality study materials. Our exam preparation material provides you everything you will need to take a certification examination. Our Nortel 920-138 Exam will provide you with exam questions with verified answers that reflect the actual exam. These questions and answers provide you with the experience of taking the actual test. High quality and value for the 920-138 Exam. 100% guarantee to pass your Nortel 920-138 exam and get your Nortel certification. We at killexams.com are committed to help you clear your 920-138 certification test with high scores. The chances of you failing to clear your 920-138 test, after going through our comprehensive exam dumps are very little.
Nortel 920-138 is ubiquitous all around the globe, and the business and programming arrangements gave by them are being grasped by every one of the organizations. They have helped in driving a large number of organizations on the beyond any doubt shot way of achievement. Far reaching learning of Nortel items are viewed as a critical capability, and the experts confirmed by them are exceptionally esteemed in all associations.
We give genuine 920-138 pdf exam inquiries and answers braindumps in two arrangements. Download PDF and Practice Tests. Pass Nortel 920-138 book Exam rapidly and effectively. The 920-138 syllabus PDF sort is accessible for perusing and printing. You can print increasingly and rehearse ordinarily. Our pass rate is high to 98.9% and the comparability rate between our 920-138 syllabus think about guide and genuine exam is 90% in light of our seven-year teaching background. Do you need accomplishments in the 920-138 exam in only one attempt? I am right now examining for the Nortel 920-138 syllabus exam.
Cause the only thing that is in any way important here is passing the Nortel 920-138 exam. Cause all that you require is a high score of Nortel 920-138 exam. The just a single thing you have to do is downloading Examcollection 920-138 exam consider directs now. We wont let you down with our unconditional promise. The experts likewise keep pace with the most up and coming exam so as to give the greater part of refreshed materials. One year free access to have the capacity to them through the date of purchase. Each applicant may bear the cost of the Nortel exam dumps through killexams.com at a low cost. Frequently there is a markdown for anybody all.
Killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for all exams on website
PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
DECSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for All Orders
killexams.com helps a large number of applicants pass the exams and get their accreditation. We have a huge number of fruitful audits. Our dumps are solid, moderate, updated and of truly best quality to conquer the challenges of any IT certifications. killexams.com exam dumps are most recent updated in exceedingly clobber way on general premise and material is discharged occasionally. Most recent killexams.com dumps are accessible in testing focuses with whom we are keeping up our relationship to get most recent material.
killexams.com Nortel Certification contemplate guides are setup by IT experts. Bunches of understudies have been whining that there are an excessive number of questions in such a significant number of training exams and study aid, and they are recently worn out to manage the cost of any more. Seeing killexams.com specialists work out this far reaching rendition while still assurance that all the learning is secured after profound research and examination. Everything is to make comfort for hopefuls on their street to affirmation.
We have Tested and Approved 920-138 Exams. killexams.com gives the most precise and most recent IT exam materials which practically contain all information focuses. With the guide of our 920-138 ponder materials, you dont have to squander your chance on perusing main part of reference books and simply need to burn through 10-20 hours to ace our 920-138 real questions and answers. Whats more, we furnish you with PDF Version and Software Version exam questions and answers. For Software Version materials, Its offered to give the candidates reenact the Nortel 920-138 exam in a real environment.
We give free updates. Inside legitimacy period, if 920-138 exam materials that you have obtained updated, we will inform you by email to download most recent variant of Q&A. On the off chance that you dont pass your Nortel VoIP Succession 1000/1000M Rls. 3.0 Installation and Maintena exam, We will give you full refund. You have to send the scanned duplicate of your 920-138 examination report card to us. Subsequent to affirming, we will rapidly give you FULL REFUND.
Killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for all exams on website
PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
DECSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for All Orders
In the event that you get ready for the Nortel 920-138 exam utilizing our testing engine. It is anything but difficult to prevail for all certifications in the primary endeavor. You dont need to manage all dumps or any free torrent / rapidshare all stuff. We offer free demo of every IT Certification Dumps. You can look at the interface, question quality and ease of use of our training exams before you choose to purchase.
Killexams MB2-527 cbt | Killexams 050-ENVCSE01 Practice Test | Killexams 000-016 reading practice test | Killexams 70-653 practice questions | Killexams HP2-Z12 real questions | Killexams 132-s-900-6 braindumps | Killexams 000-712 test questions | Killexams HP2-B109 flashcards | Killexams MB0-001 bootcamp | Killexams 000-020 free test online | Killexams HP2-061 practice test | Killexams 000-039 cram | Killexams C_BOE_30 entrance exam | Killexams 000-135 test answers | Killexams 510-308 study guide | Killexams 312-76 online test | Killexams 000-007 test questions and answers | Killexams 000-259 cheat sheets | Killexams 1Z0-481 dump | Killexams C_PM_71 mock exam |
Preparing 920-138 exam with Q&A is matter of some hours now.
I used to be trapped in the complex subjects handiest 12 earlier days the exam 920-138. Whats more it become extremely useful, as the fast solutions may be effects remembered inner 10 days. I scored ninety one%, endeavoring all inquiries in due time. To save my making plans, i was energetically looking down some fast reference. It aided me a splendid deal. By no means notion it may be so compelling! At that component, with the aid of manner of 1 manner or some other I got here to think about killexams.Com Dumps.
I got 920-138 licensed in 2 days coaching.
You can always be on pinnacle successfully with the help of killexams.Com because those products are designed for the assist of all college students. I had offered 920-138 exam guide as it was vital for me. It made me to understand all crucial ideas of this certification. It turned into proper decision therefore I am feeling pleasure on this decision. Finally, I had scored 92 percent because my helper became 920-138 exam engine. I am top because those merchandise helped me inside the instruction of certification. Thanks to the excellent team of killexams.Com for my help!
what number of questions are requested in 920-138 exam?
Ive renewed my membership this time for 920-138 exam. I take delivery of my involvement with killexams.Com is so vital it isnt viable give up thru not having a club. Im able to just recollect killexams.Com exams for my examination. Sincerely this web page can help me acquire my 920-138 accredition and assist me in getting above ninety five% marks inside the exam. You all are virtually making an wonderful displaying. Hold it up!
I need Latest and updated dumps of 920-138 exam.
Hats down the best 920-138 exam preparation option. I passed my 920-138 exam last week, and this set of exam questions and answers has been very helpful. This stuff from killexams.com is authentic. Before making a purchase, I contacted customer support with questions about how updated their materials are, and they confirmed that they update all exams on nearly daily basis. They add updates where necessary, or simply double check the content to make sure its up to date. It justifies paying for an exam brain dump. With killexams.com, I know that I can rely on the latest exam materials, not some book that can become out of date a week after its published. So I think this is the best exam preparation option. I think I will expand my certification portfolio into a few other vendors, Im just not sure which ones yet. But what Im sure about is that I will be using killexams.com as my main preparation resource.
Get these 920-138 real exam questions and Answers! Do not get rippoff
The killexams.com Q&A material as well as 920-138 Exam Simulator goes well for the exam. I used both them and succeed in the 920-138 exam without any problem. The material helped me to analyze where I was weak, so that I improved my spirit and spent enough time with the particular topic. In this way, it helped me to prepare well for the exam. I wish you good luck for you all.
it's miles unbelieveable, but 920-138 present day dumps are availabe right here.
Being a network professional, I thought appearing for 920-138 exam would really help me in my career. However, due to time restrains preparation for the examination became really tough for me. I was looking for a study guide which could make things better for me. killexams.com Q&A dumps worked like wonders for me as this is a systematic solution for more detailed study. Unexpectedly, with its help, I managed to complete the exam in just 70 minutes which is really a surprising. Thanks to killexams.com materials.
am i able to find real exam Q & A of 920-138 exam?
That is the quality examination readiness i have ever lengthy beyond over. I surpassed this 920-138 partner exam trouble unfastened. No shove, no tension, and no sadness amid the examination. I knew all that I required to recognize from this killexams.Com Q&A %. The inquiries are sizeable, and that i got notification from my associate that their coins once more surety lives up to expectancies.
actual take a look at questions today's 920-138 exam! notable source.
The association time for 920-138 examination was clearly a pleasant experience for me. Effectively passing, I actually have found out a way to clear all of the in addition degrees. Because of killexams.Com Questions & Answers for all the assistance. I had restrained time for readiness but killexams.Com brain dumps became out to be a help for me. It had sizable question and answers that made me plan in a brief compass.
Just These 920-138 Latest dumps and study guide is required to pass the test.
Im no longer an aficionado of on-line killexams.Com, in light of the truth that theyre often posted through flighty folks who misdirect I into studying stuff I neednt trouble with and missing things that I genuinely need to understand. Notkillexams.Com Q&A. This organisation gives absolutely large killexams.Com that assist me overcome 920-138 examination readiness. This is the manner by means of which I exceeded this exam from the second one attempt to scored 87% marks. Thank you
store your time and money, take these 920-138 Q&A and put together the examination.
Killexams.Com tackled all my troubles. Thinking about lengthy question and answers have become a take a look at. Anyways with concise, my making plans for 920-138 exam changed into truely an agreeable revel in. I correctly passed this exam with 79% rating. It helped me dont forget with out lifting a finger and solace. The Questions & solutions in killexams.Com are becoming for get prepared for this exam. Lots obliged killexams.Com on your backing. I should think about for lengthy simply whilst I used killexams. Motivation and excellent Reinforcement of novices is one subject matter which i discovered hard however their assist make it so smooth.
Killexams 000-Z04 mock exam | Killexams ST0-174 online test | Killexams NS0-121 free pdf | Killexams 920-163 test prep | Killexams 9L0-612 cheat sheet | Killexams C2010-653 free test | Killexams 310-013 free test online | Killexams C_TADM53_70 free pdf | Killexams 700-281 bootcamp | Killexams PCNSE7 Practice test | Killexams 9L0-611 boot camp | Killexams A2040-925 practice questions | Killexams 700-702 practice test | Killexams JK0-U21 sample test | Killexams CAT-160 test answers | Killexams 000-562 cbt | Killexams HP3-L05 dump | Killexams 000-806 test questions | Killexams HP2-H09 bootcamp | Killexams ECDL-ADVANCED brain dumps |
Pat Stoken set a checklist all through Friday nighttime's summer Drags qualifying session at U.S. 131 Motorsports Park, and he wasn't performed yet.
Stoken again Saturday and captured properly honors in the seasoned Nitrous type all the way through the 2nd annual skilled Drag Racers affiliation adventure at Martin Dragway.
the two-day program opened with Stoken stealing the headlines Friday when he ripped off a checklist run of 3.694 seconds at 201.07 mph. Stoken became the first driver to comprehensive a one-eighth mile circulate in beneath three.70 seconds, and he earned a $5,000 bonus for doing so.
The Eureka, Mont., proved difficult Saturday as well, profitable all four rounds to win his category. He drove his 2014 Camaro to victory over Steve Jackson of Evans, Ga., within the finals, posting a winning circulate of 199.03 mph at 3.755 seconds in comparison to Evans' 133.21 at four.127.
Rain washed out Saturday morning's final circular of qualifying, but officials were able to comprehensive the software. additionally Saturday, Badir Ahli earned his first PDRA win when he powered the Dubai-primarily based NAS Racing 1969 Camaro to victory in seasoned excessive. Ahli (three.622, 210.28 mph) beat Mike Rechhia in the finals.
take a look at consequences from Saturday's elimination rounds.
pro excessive final qualifying order - 1. Randell Reid, Iowa Park, Texas, 2007 Chevy Corvette, 3.513, 214.39 mph; 2. Jason Scruggs, Saltillo, miss., 1969 Chevy Camaro, three.517, 218.66 mph; 3. Brandon Snider, Atmore, Ala., 1969 Chevy Camaro, three.522, 215.fifty two mph; 4. Badir Ahli, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 1969 Chevy Camaro, 3.528, 212.16 mph; 5. Frankie Taylor, Dickinson, Texas, 2004 Chevy Corvette, three.561, 209.50 mph; 6. Terry Leggett, Pinetown, N.C., 1971 Ford Mustang, 3.568, 212.fifty six mph; 7. Mike Recchia, Roselle, unwell., 1969 Chevy Camaro, 3.589, 209.40 mph; 8. Tommy D'Aprile, Port Charlotte, Fla., 2015 Chevy Corvette, three.605, 209.59 mph; 9. Todd Tutterow, Yadkinville, N.C., 1969 Chevy Camaro, three.628, 208.72 mph; 10. Wesley Jones, Vicksburg, pass over., 1941 Willys, 3.640, 208.62 mph; 11. Eric Dillard, Ball floor, Ga., 2015 Chevy Corvette, three.669, 205.67 mph; 12. Duane Rister, Alton, sick., 1969 Chevy Camaro, 3.709, 202.70 mph; 13. Carl Stevens Jr., North Haledon, N.J., 2014 Chevy Camaro, 3.729, 214.29 mph; 14. Johnny Cobb, Lexington, Ky., 1969 Chevy Camaro, three.772, 199.eighty two mph; 15. Jay Diedrich, Firebaugh, Calif., 1970 Chevy Camaro, 3.812, 198.fifty nine mph; 16. Thomas Huddleston, Murfreesboro, Tenn., 1955 Chevy Nomad, three.881, 192.ninety seven mph.circular 1 - 1. Randell Reid, Iowa Park, Texas, 2007 Chevy Corvette, three.610, 212.06 mph, def. 16. Thomas Huddleston, Murfreesboro, Tenn., 1955 Chevy Nomad, foul; 2. Jason Scruggs, Saltillo, miss., 1969 Chevy Camaro, three.579, 211.86 mph, def. 15. Jay Diedrich, Firebaugh, Calif., 1970 Chevy Camaro, no time; three. Brandon Snider, Atmore, Ala., 1969 Chevy Camaro, four.270, 202.25 mph, def. 14. Johnny Cobb, Lexington, Ky., 1969 Chevy Camaro, no time; 4. Badir Ahli, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 1969 Chevy Camaro, 4.587, one hundred thirty.10 mph, def. 13. Carl Stevens Jr., North Haledon, N.J., 2014 Chevy Camaro, no time; 12. Duane Rister, Alton, unwell., 1969 Chevy Camaro, 3.717, 202.89 mph, def. 5. Frankie Taylor, Dickinson, Texas, 2004 Chevy Corvette, 5.126, 98.25 mph; 6. Terry Leggett, Pinetown, N.C., 1971 Ford Mustang, three.645, 207.85 mph, def. Neal Wantye, Louisville, Ky., 2008 Ford Mustang (alternate for 11. Eric Dillard, Ball floor, Ga., 2015 Chevy Corvette), 9.626, 65.ninety eight mph; 7. Mike Recchia, Roselle, sick., 1969 Chevy Camaro, 8.334, fifty two.66 mph, def. 10. Wesley Jones, Vicksburg, omit., 1941 Willys, foul; 9. Todd Tutterow, Yadkinville, N.C., 1969 Chevy Camaro, 4.273, 127.77 mph, def. 8. Tommy D'Aprile, Port Charlotte, Fla., 2015 Chevy Corvette, foul.round 2 - Recchia, 3.643, 210.fifty eight mph, def. Scruggs, no time; Ahli, three.649, 208.sixty two mph, def. Rister, 3.698, 199.03 mph; Snider, three.560, 214.ninety mph, def. Leggett, 3.655, 205.01 mph; Tutterow, 3.591, 210.ninety seven mph, def. Reid, three.577, 213.68 mph.Semifinals - Ahli, three.601, 210.18 mph, def. Tutterow, 3.583, 211.86 mph; Recchia, 3.616, 210.77 mph, def. Snider, 3.608, 213.sixty eight mph.remaining - Badir Ahli, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 1969 Chevy Camaro, 3.622, 210.28 mph, def. Mike Recchia, Roselle, sick., 1969 Chevy Camaro, no time.
professional NITROUS ultimate qualifying order - 1. Pat Stoken, Eureka, Mont., 2014 Chevy Camaro, 3.694, 201.07 mph; 2. Steve Jackson, Evans, Ga., 1969 Chevy Camaro, 3.705, 201.70 mph; 3. Rickie Smith, King, N.C., 1969 Chevy Camaro, three.741, 198.33 mph; 4. John hall, Coral Springs, Fla., 1968 Chevy Camaro, 3.751, 199.sixty five mph; 5. Mike Castellana, Muttontown, N.Y., 1969 Chevy Camaro, 3.751, 196.42 mph; 6. Tommy Franklin, Fredericksburg, Va., 1969 Chevy Camaro, 3.752, 198.24 mph; 7. Jay Cox, Smithfield, N.C., 1969 Chevy Camaro, three.753, 197.forty six mph; 8. Jim Sackuvich, Raymore, Mo., 1969 Chevy Camaro, three.764, 197.eighty mph; 9. John Camp, Canonsburg, Pa., 1969 Chevy Camaro, three.778, 198.sixty eight mph; 10. Ron Muenks, Strafford, Mo., 1968 Chevy Camaro, 3.788, 197.20 mph; eleven. Jason Harris, Pittsboro, N.C., 1968 Pontiac Firebird, 3.794, 195.65 mph; 12. Chris Rini, Carmel, N.Y., 1969 Chevy Camaro, 3.806, 194.38 mph; 13. Tommy Mauney, Shelby, N.C., 1969 Chevy Camaro, three.809, 197.37 mph; 14. Travis Harvey, Elon, N.C., 2014 Chevy Camaro, 3.816, 197.89 mph; 15. Keith Haney, damaged Arrow, Okla., 2014 Chevy Camaro, 3.817, 195.48 mph; 16. Bob Gulitti, Tomball, Texas, 1967 Ford Mustang, 3.820, 193.13 mph.round 1 - 1. Pat Stoken, Eureka, Mont., 2014 Chevy Camaro, 3.794, 199.12 mph, def. 16. Bob Gulitti, Tomball, Texas, 1967 Ford Mustang, 3.830, 192.88 mph; 2. Steve Jackson, Evans, Ga., 1969 Chevy Camaro, three.782, 199.91 mph, def. Robert Patrick, Fredericksburg, Va., 1969 Chevy Camaro (alternate for 15. Keith Haney, broken Arrow, Okla., 2014 Chevy Camaro), 6.139, seventy eight.34 mph; three. Rickie Smith, King, N.C., 1969 Chevy Camaro, 3.812, 197.72 mph, def. 14. Travis Harvey, Elon, N.C., 2014 Chevy Camaro, 3.824, 197.seventy two mph; 13. Tommy Mauney, Shelby, N.C., 1969 Chevy Camaro, 3.915, 194.22 mph, def. four. John hall, Coral Springs, Fla., 1968 Chevy Camaro, 3.934, 179.21 mph; 5. Mike Castellana, Muttontown, N.Y., 1969 Chevy Camaro, three.820, 195.31 mph, def. 12. Chris Rini, Carmel, N.Y., 1969 Chevy Camaro, 3.828, 194.05 mph; 6. Tommy Franklin, Fredericksburg, Va., 1969 Chevy Camaro, three.981, 164.65 mph, def. eleven. Jason Harris, Pittsboro, N.C., 1968 Pontiac Firebird, foul; 7. Jay Cox, Smithfield, N.C., 1969 Chevy Camaro, three.778, 197.eighty mph, def. 10. Ron Muenks, Strafford, Mo., 1968 Chevy Camaro, 4.123, a hundred and sixty.37 mph; eight. Jim Sackuvich, Raymore, Mo., 1969 Chevy Camaro, 3.800, 197.28 mph, def. 9. John Camp, Canonsburg, Pa., 1969 Chevy Camaro, three.809. 197.20 mph.round 2 - Castellana, 3.784, 197.37 mph, def. Mauney, 6.820, seventy four.ninety six mph; Smith, 3.756, 198.33 mph, def. Franklin, three.765, 199.20 mph; Stoken, 3.743, 199.38 mph, def. Sackuvich, three.802, 198.33 mph; Jackson, three.726, 200.18 mph, def. Cox, 3.735, 199.65 mph.Semifinals - Stoken, 3.738, 200.fifty three mph, def. Castellana, 3.770, 197.02 mph; Jackson, 3.745, 201.25 mph, def. Smith, 3.775, 198.06 mph.last - Pat Stoken, Eureka, Mont., 2014 Chevy Camaro, 3.755, 199.03 mph def. Steve Jackson, Evans, Ga., 1969 Chevy Camaro, 4.127, 133.21 mph.
seasoned BOOSTFinal qualifying order - 1. Todd Moyer, San Leon, Texas, 2015 Chevy Camaro, 3.839, 205.10 mph; 2. Kevin Fiscus, Jacksonville, Fla., 2012 Ford Mustang, three.840, 205.39 mph; 3. Jim Bell, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, 1969 Chevy Camaro, three.842, 203.53 mph; four. Steve Summers, Utica, sick., 1970 Chevy Camaro, 3.846, 202.79 mph; 5. Gerry Capano, Greenville, Del., 1963 Chevy Corvette, three.855, 193.13 mph; 6. Brian Hicks, Genoa, unwell., 1970 Plymouth Duster, three.875, 200.ninety eight mph; 7. Andy Jensen, Nassapaugh, Pa., 1968 Chevy Camaro, 3.879, 191.25 mph; 8. Alan Pittman, Greenville, S.C., 1969 Chevy Camaro, three.881, 189.08 mph; 9. Jason Hamstra, Demotte, Ind., 2010 Ford Mustang, 3.894, 192.fifty five mph; 10. Ric Fleck, Lexington, S.C., 1941 Willys, 3.897, 187.19 mph; 11. Kevin Rivenbark, Wallace, N.C., 2015 Chevy Corvette, three.898, 189.23 mph; 12. Eddie Rogers, Berryville, Ark., 1969 Chevy Chevelle, three.900, 188.13 mph; 13. Colby Barker, Alma, Ga., 2000 Chevy Corvette, three.912, 186.64 mph; 14. Tylor Miller, Hartsville, S.C., 1969 Chevy Chevelle, 3.914, 181.09 mph; 15. Tony Williams, Millington, Tenn., 1968 Chevy Camaro, three.915, 187.forty two mph; sixteen. Scott Christoffel, Oswego, sick., 1968 Chevy Camaro, three.915, 186.80 mph.circular 1 - Jeremy Ray, Lugoff, S.C., 1957 Chevy Bel Air (as alternate for 1. Todd Moyer, San Leon, Texas, 2015 Chevy Camaro), three.942, 188.28 mph, def. 16. Scott Christoffel, Oswego, unwell., 1968 Chevy Camaro, foul; 2. Kevin Fiscus, Jacksonville, Fla., 2012 Ford Mustang, four.287, 185.11 mph, def. 15. Tony Williams, Millington, Tenn., 1968 Chevy Camaro, 5.856, 86.06 mph; three. Jim Bell, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, 1969 Chevy Camaro, 3.865, 202.70 mph, def. 14. Tylor Miller, Hartsville, S.C., 1969 Chevy Chevelle, three.922, 182.eighty five mph; four. Steve Summers, Utica, ill., 1970 Chevy Camaro, 3.873, 201.34 mph, def. 13. Colby Barker, Alma, Ga., 2000 Chevy Corvette, 6.866, 78.70 mph; 12. Eddie Rogers, Berryville, Ark., 1969 Chevy Chevelle, 3.902, 188.92 mph, def. 5. Gerry Capano, Greenville, Del., 1963 Chevy Corvette, foul; 6. Brian Hicks, Genoa, unwell., 1970 Plymouth Duster, three.885, 202.25 mph, def. eleven. Kevin Rivenbark, Wallace, N.C., 2015 Chevy Corvette, three.879, 192.23 mph; 7. Andy Jensen, Nassapaugh, Pa., 1968 Chevy Camaro, three.908, 193.72 mph, def. 10. Ric Fleck, Lexington, S.C., 1941 Willys, foul; eight. Alan Pittman, Greenville, S.C., 1969 Chevy Camaro, four.512, a hundred seventy five.58 mph, def. 9. Jason Hamstra, Demotte, Ind., 2010 Ford Mustang, 4.660, 173.95 mph.circular 2 - Pittman, 5.199, 102.18 mph, def. Ray, foul; Fiscus, three.836, 205.29 mph, def. Jensen, 3.889, 195.ninety one mph; Rogers, four.083, 178.forty three mph, def. Summers, foul; Bell, 3.892, 203.34 mph, def. Hicks, foul.Semifinals - Pittman, three.893, 189.95 mph, def. Rogers, 5.604, 114.sixty five mph; Bell, 3.890, 203.sixty two mph, def. Fiscus, three.836, 205.39 mph.closing - Alan Pittman, Greenville, S.C., 1969 Chevy Camaro, three.875, a hundred ninety.sixty eight mph, def. Jim Bell, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, 1969 Chevy Camaro, foul.
seasoned excessive MOTORCYCLEFinal qualifying order - 1. Chris Garner-Jones, Harvest, Ala., four.044, 174.28 mph;2. Eric McKinney, Hamersville, Ohio, four.048, 177.03 mph; three. Terry Schweigert, Abbotsford, British Columbia, Canada, 4.116, 169.ninety four mph; four. Ashley Owens, Decatur, Ala., 4.one hundred thirty, 172.88 mph; 5. T.T. Jones, Harvest, Ala., four.183, 169.forty three mph.circular 1 - 1. Chris Garner-Jones, Harvest, Ala., bye; 3. Terry Schweigert, Abbotsford, British Columbia, Canada, four.169, 167.04 mph, def. four. Ashley Owens, Decatur, Ala., four.163, 166.11 mph; 2. Eric McKinney, Hamersville, Ohio, four.064, 274.89 mph, def. 5. T.T. Jones, Harvest, Ala., 4.353, 256.20 mph.Semifinals - McKinney, bye; Garner-Jones, four.055, 173.28 mph, def. Schweigert, 4.241, 139.19 mph.ultimate - Chris Garner-Jones, Harvest, Ala., four.028, 174.15 mph, def. Eric McKinney, Hamersville, Ohio, four.061, one hundred seventy five.99 mph.
professional OPEN OUTLAWFinal qualifying order - 1. Jody Stroud, New Carlisle, Ohio, three.668, 198.50 mph;2. Phil Esz, Amelia, Ohio, three.682, 200.fifty three mph; three. Eddie Lykins, New Carlisle, Ohio, 3.685, 199.47 mph; four. Paul Molnar, Hinckley, Ohio, 3.697, 199.fifty six mph; 5. Bryan Keller, Macedonia, Ohio, 3.764, 196.16 mph; 6. Eddie Careccia, Mars Hill, N.C., 3.816, 189.ninety five mph; 7. Chris Smith, Bangor, Mich., 3.883, 185.26 mph; eight. Michael Scheel, Norwalk, Ohio, 3.997, 182.26 mph.round 1 - 1. Jody Stroud, New Carlisle, Ohio, 3.634, 199.73 mph, def. eight. Michael Scheel, Norwalk, Ohio, 4.257, 179.35 mph; 2. Phil Esz, Amelia, Ohio, 9.263, 43.12 mph, def. 7. Chris Smith, Bangor, Mich., 13.570, no legitimate velocity; 3. Eddie Lykins, New Carlisle, Ohio, 3.744, 197.forty six mph, def. 6. Eddie Careccia, Mars Hill, N.C., no time; 5. Bryan Keller, Macedonia, Ohio, three.773, 195.31 mph, def. four. Paul Molnar, Hinckley, Ohio, foul.Semifinals - Lykins, three.706, 197.28 mph, def. Esz, three.892, 192.23 mph; Stroud, 3.614, 199.eighty two mph, def. Keller, three.749, 196.34 mph.remaining - Jody Stroud, New Carlisle, Ohio, 3.625, 198.41 mph, def. Eddie Lykins, New Carlisle, Ohio, 3.951, 186.41 mph.
excellent SPORTSMANFinal qualifying order - 1. Tricia Musi, Mooresville, N.C., 2009 stay clear of Stratus, 3.947, 191.16 mph; 2. Jackie Slone Jr., Belleville, Mich., NA, three.983, 183.eighty two mph; three. Ronnie Davis, Suwanee, Ga., 1963 Chevy Corvette, four.005, a hundred and eighty.87 mph; four. Barry Daniluk, purple Deer, Alberta, Canada, 1968 Chevy Camaro, four.035, 177.eighty mph; 5. Don Klooster, Kalamazoo, Mich., 1963 Chevy Corvette, four.053, one hundred eighty.36 mph; 6. Dan Ferguson, Harrisburg, N.C., 2002 Pontiac Firebird, 4.069, 176.forty mph; 7. Boyd Beyer, Casstown, Ohio, 2004 Ford Mustang, 4.080, a hundred and eighty.58 mph; 8. Eric Burnett, Charlestown, Ind., 2005 Chevy Cavalier, 4.082, 182.19 mph; 9. Bruce Thrift, Waycross, Ga., 2009 Pontiac GTO, four.082, 176.33 mph; 10. Tom Stultz, Terre Haute, Ind., 1968 Chevy Camaro, four.099, 178.seventy eight mph; 11. Cheyenne Stanley, Cynthiana, Ky., 2007 Ford Mustang, four.102, 173.eighty one mph; 12. Bob Gulitti, Tomball, Texas, 2011 Chevy Camaro, 4.108, 176.54 mph; 13. Ryan Hill, Valpraiso, Ind., 2002 Pontiac Firebird, four.109, 177.73 mph; 14. Tim Lawrence, Princeton, West Va., 2013 Chevy Camaro, 4.113, a hundred seventy five.03 mph; 15. Curt Fredrich, Burlington, Wis., 1968 Chevy Camaro, four.128, 176.40 mph; 16. Aaron Glaser, Shepherdsville, Ky., 1969 Chevy Camaro, 4.149, 170.seventy eight mph.round 1 - 1. Tricia Musi, Mooresville, N.C., 2009 circumvent Stratus, NA, four.535, on a three.950, 134.97 mph, def. 9. Bruce Thrift, Waycross, Ga., 2009 Pontiac GTO, foul; 10. Tom Stultz, Terre Haute, Ind., 1968 Chevy Camaro, .016, four.148 on a four.a hundred and twenty, 173.eighty one mph, def. 2. Jackie Slone Jr., Belleville, Mich., NA, .012, 4.020 on a three.980, 183.45 mph; eleven. Cheyenne Stanley, Cynthiana, Ky., 2007 Ford Mustang, .029, four.136 on a 4.130, 1647.eighty five mph, def. three. Ronnie Davis, Suwanee, Ga., 1963 Chevy Corvette, .026, four.097 on a 4.080, 176.54 mph; 12. Bob Gulitti, Tomball, Texas, 2011 Chevy Camaro, .024, 4.176 on a four.a hundred, 166.54 mph, def. four. Barry Daniluk, red Deer, Alberta, Canada, 1968 Chevy Camaro, .121, 4.083 on a four.030, 176.89 mph; 13. Ryan Hill, Valpraiso, Ind., 2002 Pontiac Firebird, .002, 4.118 on a 4.050, 1178.seventy eight mph, def. 5. Don Klooster, Kalamazoo, Mich., 1963 Chevy Corvette, foul; 14. Tim Lawrence, Princeton, West Va., 2013 Chevy Camaro, .026, 4.130 on a 4.one hundred twenty, 174.eighty three mph, def. 6. Dan Ferguson, Harrisburg, N.C., 2002 Pontiac Firebird, .058, 4.111 on a 4.080, 174.69 mph; 15. Curt Fredrich, Burlington, Wis., 1968 Chevy Camaro, .038, four.227 on a four.240, 169.05 mph, def. 7. Boyd Beyer, Casstown, Ohio, 2004 Ford Mustang, no time; 8. Eric Burnett, Charlestown, Ind., 2005 Chevy Cavalier, .061, 6.266 on a four.070, 169.05 mph, def. sixteen. Aaron Glaser, Shepherdsville, Ky., 1969 Chevy Camaro, foul.circular 2 - Lawrence, .024, four.129 on a four.120, 174.83 mph, def. Stultz, foul; Stanley, .027, 4.126 on a four.130, 168.86 mph, def. Fredrich, foul; Gulitti, .017, four.213 on a 4.a hundred and twenty, 171.36 mph, def. Burnett, foul; Musi, .078, 3.934 on a 3.980, 192.72 mph, def. Hill, foul.Semifinals - Lawrence, .026, four.115 on a 4.110, 175.forty four mph, def. Gulitti, foul; Musi, .015, 3.934 on a three.920, 191.08 mph, def. Stanley, .075, 4.a hundred thirty five on a four.130, 157.73 mph.closing - Tim Lawrence, Princeton, West Va., 2013 Chevy Camaro, .005, four.686 on a four.100, 164.seventy one mph, def. Tricia Musi, Mooresville, N.C., 2009 steer clear of Stratus, .071, four.441 on a three.920, 138.89 mph.
proper DRAGSTERFinal qualifying order - 1. Craig Sullivan, Avon, Ind., three.908, 181.seventy four mph;2. Michael Smith, Owosso, Mich., three.918, 185.11 mph; 3. Greg Cortis, Brook Park, Ohio, three.918, 182.ninety three mph; 4. Tom Elliott, Brooks, N.Y., three.959, 182.85 mph; 5. Dan Norris, Brighton, Mich., three.966, 182.70 mph; 6. Bob Sheridan Jr., Lynchburg, Ohio, three.982, 178.29 mph; 7. Bob Mandell, Culleoka, Tenn., three.984, 176.26 mph; 8. Joe Hessling, Toledo, Ohio, three.992, 183.30 mph; 9. Jim Prevo, Mundelein, sick., 4.017, 174.fifty five mph; 10. Justin Melton, Gleason, Tenn., 4.025, 174.08 mph; 11. Tim Paap, Charleston, unwell., 4.027, one hundred seventy five.10 mph; 12. Jim Huggett, Florissant, Mo., 4.028, 174.49 mph; 13. Richard Edwards, Terre Haute, Ind., four.029, one hundred eighty.14 mph; 14. Ryan Smith, Kenosha, Wis., four.033, 174.83 mph; 15. Kyle Dvorak, McHenry, ill., four.039, 177.03 mph; 16. Laramie Reid, Iowa Park, Texas, four.045, 176.89 mph.round 1 - 9. Jim Prevo, Mundelein, ill., .011 response time, four.065 on a four.020, 166.73 mph, def. 1. Craig Sullivan, Avon, Ind., .027, 3.959 on a three.900, 182.11 mph; 10. Justin Melton, Gleason, Tenn., .029, four.056 on a 4.040, 172.55 mph, def. 2. Michael Smith, Owosso, Mich., foul; 11. Tim Paap, Charleston, unwell., NA, 4.075 on a four.080, 173.61 mph, def. 3. Greg Cortis, Brook Park, Ohio, no time; 12. Jim Huggett, Florissant, Mo., .051, 4.045 on a 4.030, 173.75 mph, def. 4. Tom Elliott, Brooks, N.Y., foul; 5. Dan Norris, Brighton, Mich., .006, 6.371 on a three.950, a hundred and ten.54 mph, def. 13. Richard Edwards, Terre Haute, Ind., no time; 6. Bob Sheridan Jr., Lynchburg, Ohio, .001, four.010 on a three.980, 169.sixty two mph, def. 14. Ryan Smith, Kenosha, Wis., .013, four.071 on a 4.020, 166.24 mph; 15. Kyle Dvorak, McHenry, sick., .013, 4.109 on a four.090, 171.sixty nine mph, def. 7. Bob Mandell, Culleoka, Tenn., .025, four.051 on a 4.040, 172.forty eight mph; 8. Joe Hessling, Toledo, Ohio, .017, 007 on a 4.000, 174.62 mph, def. 16. Laramie Reid, Iowa Park, Texas, .009, 4.079 on a four.060, 174.15 mph.circular 2 - Hessling, .020, four.002 on a three.990, a hundred and seventy.sixty five mph, def. Huggett, .041, four.028 breakout on a 4.040, 174.28 mph; Prevo, .023, four.124 on a four.020, 149.50 mph, def. Norris, .024, 4.324 on a 3.920, 178.08 mph; Melton, .017, 4.035 on a four.040, 173.41 mph, def. Sheridan, .012, 3.955 breakout on a 3.980, 176.sixty one mph; Dvorak, .020, 4.128 on a 4.one hundred, 150.55 mph, def. Paap, 1.014, 4.079 on a four.060, 168.48 mph.Semifinals - Hessling, .016, 3.981 on a 3.980, 181.eighty two mph, def. Melton, .018, 4.035 on a 4.020, 170.45 mph; Prevo, .018, four.028 on a four.020, one hundred seventy.forty five mph, def. Dvorak, .021, four.083 breakout on a four.090, 175.03 mph.closing - Joe Hessling, Toledo, Ohio, .046, four.178 on a three.970, 138.89 mph, def. Jim Prevo, Mundelein, sick., .012, 6.442 on a 4.020, 50.ninety one mph.
JUNIOR DRAGSTER FINALSPRO JR. DRAGSTER - Preston Tanner, Rensselaer, Ind., .026, 7.905, eighty.30 mph, def. Samuel Peterson, Richland, Mich., .047, 7.885 breakout, eighty two.36 mph.top JR. DRAGSTER - Caleb Russell, Ardmore, Ala., .049, 7.956 on a 7.930, 83.12 mph, def. Adam Barr, Olive, Mich., .047, 7.939 on a 7.900, eighty one.08 mph.
Shane Watson and Jacques Kallis are among the many infrequent allrounders who bat in the right 5 and bowl a considerable number of overs
Shane Watson opens for Australia and is their fourth fast bowler © AFP
On the 2nd day of the Newlands verify, Shane Watson all started the insanity after lunch with a five-wicket burst that routed South Africa for ninety six. He had little time to savour his performance for he became quickly opening Australia's 2d innings. Watson lasted most effective three balls as Australia had been razed for forty seven. within the aftermath of that eight-wicket defeat, Watson mentioned it had been a problem to swap to a batting attitude soon after bowling. during this week's column, therefore, we now have examined the look at various stats of exact-order allrounders: those who batted within the top five and bowled a titanic number of overs as well. The likes of Watson and Garry Sobers, no longer Daniel Vettori and Ian Botham, who batted lower than No. 5.
the first desk lists all avid gamers who batted in the excellent 5 for greater than half their careers and bowled an ordinary of 15 overs per test. It starts off with George Ulyett (1877-1890) and ends with Watson (2005-2011). There are most effective forty two in all, out of 2658 check cricketers, making the precise-order allrounder a rare asset. Manoj Prabhakar, Carl Hooper, Jacques Kallis, Neil Johnson, Shahid Afridi and Watson are the simplest ones considering the fact that 1980.
a further existing allrounder who's close to getting on that checklist is Mohammad Hafeez. He has opened in all 41 innings but bowled only 310 overs in 21 checks, which is fewer than our qualification regular of 15 overs a fit. He has turn into a tons greater standard bowler for Pakistan in the closing three hundred and sixty five days, notwithstanding. Bangladesh's Shakib Al Hasan has batted above No. 6 simplest once, so doesn't make the cut.list of proper-order allrounders (over half of profession in good 5, ordinary of 90 balls per healthy, minimal of 10 exams) player Span Mat innsNO Runs HS Bat Av a hundred 50 Balls Conc Wkts BBI Bowl Av 5G Ulyett (Eng) 1877-1890 25 39 0 949 149 24.33 1 7 2627 1020 50 7/36 20.forty 1 AG metal (Eng) 1880-1888 13 20 3 600148 35.29 2 0 1360 605 29 3/27 20.86 0 RG Barlow (Eng) 1881-1887 17 30 4 591 62 22.73 0 2 2456 767 34 7/40 22.55 3 W Bates (Eng) 1881-1887 15 26 2 656 sixty four 27.33 0 52364 821 50 7/28 sixteen.forty two four G Giffen (Aus) 1881-1896 31 53 0 1238 161 23.35 1 6 6391 2791 103 7/117 27.09 7 MA Noble (Aus) 1898-1909 42 73 7 1997 133 30.25 1 16 7159 3025 121 7/17 25.00 9W Rhodes (Eng) 1899-1930 58 98 21 2325 179 30.19 2 eleven 8225 3425 127 eight/sixty eight 26.96 6 WW Armstrong (Aus) 1902-1921 50 eighty four 10 2863 159* 38.sixty eight 6 eight 8022 2923 87 6/35 33.59 three GA Faulkner (SA) 1906-1924 25 forty seven four 1754 204 40.seventy nine four 8 4227 2180 eighty two 7/eighty four 26.58 four CG Macartney (Aus) 1907-1926 35 fifty five 4 2131 a hundred and seventy forty one.seventy eight 7 nine3561 1240 45 7/58 27.55 2 FE Woolley (Eng) 1909-1934 sixty four 98 7 3283 154 36.07 523 6495 2815 83 7/76 33.91 four C Kelleway (Aus) 1910-1928 26 42 4 1422 147 37.42 3 6 4363 1683 52 5/33 32.36 1 JW Hearne (Eng) 1911-1926 24 36 five806 114 26.00 1 2 2926 1462 30 5/49 48.seventy three 1 J Ryder (Aus) 1920-1929 20 32 51394 201* 51.sixty two three nine1897 743 17 2/20 forty three.70 0 WR Hammond (Eng) 1927-1947 eighty five one hundred forty 16 7249 336* 58.45 22 24 7969 3138 eighty three 5/36 37.eighty 2 DPB Morkel (SA) 1927-1932 16 28 1 663 88 24.55 0 4 1704 821 18 four/93 forty five.sixty one 0 SJ McCabe (Aus) 1930-1938 39 sixty two five2748 232 forty eight.21 6 13 3746 1543 36 four/13 42.86 0 L Amarnath (India) 1933-1952 24 forty four 878 118 24.38 1 4 4241 1481 forty five 5/ninety six 32.91 2 KR Miller (Aus) 1946-1956 fifty five 87 7 2958 147 36.97 7 13 10461 3906 one hundred seventy 7/60 22.ninety seven 7 VS Hazare (India) 1946-1953 30 fifty two 6 2192 164* 47.65 7 92840 1220 20 4/29 sixty one.00 0 MH Mankad (India) 1946-1959 forty four 72 five2109 231 31.47 56 14686 5236 162 8/52 32.32 8 FMM Worrell (WI) 1948-1963 fifty one 87 93860 261 49.48 nine22 7141 2672 sixty nine 7/70 38.72 2 AJ Watkins (Eng) 1948-1952 15 24 4 810 137* forty.50 2 4 1364 554 11 3/20 50.36 0 GO Rabone (NZ) 1949-1955 12 20 2 562 107 31.22 1 2 1385 635 sixteen 6/68 39.68 1 JR Reid (NZ) 1949-1965 58 108 53428 142 33.28 6 22 7725 2835 eighty five 6/60 33.35 1 GS Sobers (WI) 1954-1974 ninety three 160 21 8032 365* fifty seven.78 26 30 21599 7999 235 6/seventy three 34.03 6 OG Smith (WI) 1955-1959 26 forty two 0 1331 168 31.69 4 6 4431 1625 forty eight 5/ninety 33.85 1 TL Goddard (SA) 1955-1970 forty one 78 52516 112 34.46 1 18 11736 3226 123 6/fifty three 26.22 5RB Simpson (Aus) 1957-1978 62 111 7 4869 311 46.eighty one 10 27 6881 3001 71 5/57 forty two.26 2 Mushtaq Mohammad (Pak) 1959-1979 57 a hundred 7 3643 201 39.17 10 19 5260 2309 seventy nine 5/28 29.22 3 RW Barber (Eng) 1960-1968 28 forty five three 1495 185 35.fifty nine 1 nine3426 1806 42 4/132 forty three.00 0 RF Surti (India) 1960-1969 26 forty eight 4 1263 99 28.70 0 93870 1962 42 5/74 forty six.seventy one 1 EJ Barlow (SA) 1961-1970 30 57 2 2516 201 forty five.74 6 15 3021 1362 forty 5/eighty five 34.05 1 RM Cowper (Aus) 1964-1968 27 forty six 2 2061 307 forty six.84 510 3005 1139 36 four/48 31.sixty three 0 BE Congdon (NZ) 1965-1978 61 114 7 3448 176 32.22 7 19 5620 2154 59 5/sixty five 36.50 1 BL D'Oliveira (Eng) 1966-1972 44 70 8 2484 158 40.06 five15 5706 1859 47 3/forty six 39.fifty five 0 M Prabhakar (India) 1984-1995 39 58 91600 120 32.sixty five 1 97475 3581 ninety six 6/132 37.30 three CL Hooper (WI) 1987-2002 102 173 15 5762 233 36.46 13 27 13794 5635 114 5/26 forty nine.42 4 JH Kallis (ICC/SA) 1995-2011 146 248 39 11949 201* 57.17 40 fifty four 18373 8680 270 6/fifty four 32.14 5NC Johnson (Zim) 1998-2000 13 23 1 532 107 24.18 1 4 1186 594 15 four/77 39.60 0 Shahid Afridi (Pak) 1998-2010 27 48 1 1716 156 36.51 58 3194 1709 forty eight 5/fifty two 35.60 1 SR Watson (Aus) 2005-2011 31 56 2 2047 126 37.90 2 15 3141 1556 55 6/33 28.29 three
Our 2nd desk is a list of allrounders with the most effective averages while batting within the excellent 5, in exams through which they bowled more than 10 overs in the same innings. Jacques Kallis, for example, has batted within the excellent 5 for South Africa and bowled more than 10 overs in an innings in 129 innings. He has scored 5713 runs in those innings at a typical of fifty one, while taking 176 wickets at 35.61 apiece.
Garry Sobers, widely acknowledged to be the allrounder sans pareil, batted larger than No. 6 and bowled more than 10 overs in 54 innings. He scored 2696 runs in these innings at a standard of 55, and took 94 wickets at a regular of 34 every.
The choicest batting average when bowling as a minimum 10 overs in the same innings belongs to former West Indies captain Frank Worrell. He averaged 71.sixty five with the bat in 36 innings, with seven centuries and 10 fifties, and took forty one wickets at a typical of just under forty.top of the line batting usual in the good 5 when bowling greater than 60 balls in the equal innings (minimal of 20 innings) player Span lodgesNO Runs HS Bat Av one hundred 50 Balls Conc Wkts BBI Bowl Av 5FMM Worrell (WI) 1948-1961 36 four 2293 261 71.sixty five 7 10 4197 1625 41 7/70 39.sixty three 2 RB Simpson (Aus) 1960-1978 37 2 2462 311 70.34 7 13 4290 1761 41 5/57 forty two.95 2 SJ McCabe (Aus) 1930-1938 24 2 1415 232 64.31 4 five2421 983 21 4/13 46.eighty 0 GS Sobers (WI) 1955-1974 fifty four five2696 226 fifty five.02 10 7 8607 3208 94 5/sixty three 34.12 2 ER Dexter (Eng) 1959-1964 26 1 1354 205 54.sixteen 1 12 3020 1298 32 4/38 40.fifty six 0 RJ Shastri (India) 1981-1992 26 1 1318 206 52.seventy two fivefive3572 1633 32 4/78 51.03 0 JH Kallis (SA) 1997-2010 129 17 5713 one hundred sixty fifty one.00 18 29 13033 6269 176 6/fifty four 35.sixty one four GA Faulkner (SA) 1907-1912 25 2 1129 204 49.08 three 6 3045 1668 56 7/84 29.78 three ST Jayasuriya (SL) 1994-2007 forty 2 1855 340 48.81 four 7 4340 1631 59 5/34 27.sixty four 2 MH Mankad (India) 1946-1956 33 2 1442 231 46.51 fivethree 7859 2890 eighty three eight/52 34.eighty one fiveCH Gayle (WI) 2000-2009 45 2 1999 317 46.forty eight five9 4986 2109 fifty four 5/34 39.05 2 Mushtaq Mohammad (Pak) 1967-1978 22 2 929 157 46.forty five three 52630 1114 44 5/28 25.31 1 KR Miller (Aus) 1946-1956 fifty nine five2304 147 42.sixty six 7 nine7232 2759 122 7/60 22.sixty one 6 CL Hooper (WI) 1988-2002 sixty two three 2315 233 39.23 four 15 7550 2952 59 5/26 50.03 1 EJ Barlow (SA) 1962-1970 24 0 920 138 38.33 three 6 2199 967 31 5/eighty five 31.19 1 ME Waugh (Aus) 1992-2002 20 1 713 137 37.fifty two 2 3 1619 746 21 5/40 35.fifty two 1 Mudassar Nazar (Pak) 1978-1989 36 3 1237 199 37.48 four 2 3764 1597 43 four/fifty five 37.13 0 WR Hammond (Eng) 1927-1939 forty nine 1 1789 177 37.27 4 7 5385 2065 forty seven 5/57 forty three.93 1 BE Congdon (NZ) 1965-1978 32 3 1076 166* 37.10 three 6 4008 1510 47 5/65 32.12 1 BL D'Oliveira (Eng) 1967-1972 21 1 729 117 36.forty five 1 four 2438 739 22 three/46 33.fifty nine 0
The third table incorporates allrounders with the most efficient bowling averages when batting within the correct 5 in the same innings. Keith Miller averaged 22.41 apiece for his 129 wickets and batted in the precise 5 in seventy six innings, scoring 2687 runs at an ordinary of 38.
Trevor Goddard, the former South Africa captain, used to open the innings and bowl first or 2d exchange. He opened the bowling in 5 innings as well. So in seventy two innings through which Goddard batted within the exact five, he took 114 wickets at a regular of below 27. He scored 2337 runs in these innings at a standard of 34.optimum bowling typical when batting in the right 5 in the equal innings (minimal of 20 innings, 2000 balls) participant Span lodgesNO Runs HS Bat Av 100 50 Balls Conc Wkts BBI Bowl Av 5TE Bailey (Eng) 1949-1959 29 1 749 134* 26.75 1 2 2744 893 forty three 7/34 20.76 2 KR Miller (Aus) 1946-1956 76 6 2687 147 38.38 7 12 7623 2891 129 7/60 22.forty one 6 WJ Cronje (SA) 1992-2000 96 6 3313 135 36.eighty one 6 20 2827 942 36 3/14 26.sixteen 0 TL Goddard (SA) 1955-1970 72 four 2337 112 34.36 1 16 10894 3055 114 6/53 26.seventy nine 5Mushtaq Mohammad (Pak) 1960-1978 seventy one 4 2706 201 40.38 eight 15 3515 1543 fifty seven 5/28 27.07 1 GA Faulkner (SA) 1907-1912 29 2 1372 204 50.eighty one 3 eight 3105 1696 fifty six 7/84 30.28 3 MA Noble (Aus) 1899-1909 53 3 1561 133 31.22 1 14 4352 1880 61 7/17 30.81 2 BL D'Oliveira (Eng) 1967-1972 43 51553 117 forty.86 3 92972 898 29 three/forty six 30.ninety six 0 RM Cowper (Aus) 1964-1968 39 1 1898 307 forty nine.ninety four 59 2821 1058 33 four/forty eight 32.06 0 M Prabhakar (India) 1984-1995 30 2 905 120 32.32 1 five2379 1165 35 5/104 33.28 1 JR Reid (NZ) 1949-1965 seventy seven 2 2732 one hundred thirty five 36.forty two 518 7121 2630 79 6/60 33.29 1 G Giffen (Aus) 1883-1896 36 0 981 161 27.25 1 five4944 2173 65 6/seventy two 33.43 3 JH Kallis (ICC/SA) 1997-2011 226 34 11338 201* fifty nine.05 39 51 15478 7455 219 6/fifty four 34.04 4 FE Woolley (Eng) 1910-1934 67 4 2262 154 35.ninety 3 16 3885 1642 48 7/76 34.20 3 ST Jayasuriya (SL) 1992-2007 151 8 5711 340 39.93 12 24 6418 2640 77 5/34 34.28 2 MH Mankad (India) 1946-1956 38 2 1567 231 forty three.52 five4 8026 3019 88 8/fifty two 34.30 5GS Sobers (WI) 1955-1974 79 eight 4384 365* sixty one.74 17 eleven 9127 3445 100 5/sixty three 34.forty five 2 EJ Barlow (SA) 1961-1970 fifty five 2 2501 201 forty seven.18 6 15 2793 1279 37 5/eighty five 34.56 1 BE Congdon (NZ) 1965-1978 96 five3104 176 34.10 7 17 4750 1838 53 5/65 34.sixty seven 1 WW Armstrong (Aus) 1902-1921 forty two 2 1646 159* forty one.15 3 54464 1583 45 5/27 35.17 2
So which allrounder needed to do the most bowling on normal after batting within the properly five? Goddard had one of the optimum average variety of balls bowled when batting in the right 5 in the identical innings. He bowled 10894 balls in seventy two innings - a standard of 151.3 balls.
The optimum common, youngsters, belongs to India's Vinoo Mankad, who averaged 211 balls per innings for the 38 innings in which he batted within the exact 5. Mankad took 88 wickets at 34.30 apiece in these innings and scored 1567 runs at a typical of forty three,fifty two.optimum rate of balls bowled per innings when batting in the accurate 5 in the equal innings (minimum of 20 innings) participant Span motelsNO Runs HS Bat Av a hundred 50 Balls Conc Wkts BBI Bowl Av 5B/I MH Mankad (India) 1946-1956 38 2 1567 231 43.52 54 8026 3019 88 eight/fifty two 34.30 5211.2 TL Goddard (SA) 1955-1970 seventy two four 2337 112 34.36 1 16 10894 3055 114 6/fifty three 26.seventy nine 5151.3 G Giffen (Aus) 1883-1896 36 0 981 161 27.25 1 five4944 2173 65 6/72 33.forty three three 137.three IT Botham (Eng) 1978-1987 20 1 994 208 fifty two.31 three four 2343 1313 34 5/forty six 38.sixty one 1 117.1 GS Sobers (WI) 1955-1974 seventy nine eight 4384 365* sixty one.74 17 11 9127 3445 one hundred 5/63 34.forty five 2 one hundred fifteen.fiveL Amarnath (India) 1933-1952 22 1 503 118 23.ninety five 1 1 2437 900 22 5/118 forty.90 1 110.7 GA Faulkner (SA) 1907-1912 29 2 1372 204 50.eighty one 3 8 3105 1696 56 7/eighty four 30.28 three 107.0 WW Armstrong (Aus) 1902-1921 forty two 2 1646 159* forty one.15 three 54464 1583 45 5/27 35.17 2 106.2 KR Miller (Aus) 1946-1956 seventy six 6 2687 147 38.38 7 12 7623 2891 129 7/60 22.41 6 one hundred.three TE Bailey (Eng) 1949-1959 29 1 749 134* 26.75 1 2 2744 893 forty three 7/34 20.seventy six 2 ninety four.6 JR Reid (NZ) 1949-1965 seventy seven 2 2732 a hundred thirty five 36.42 five18 7121 2630 79 6/60 33.29 1 92.four RF Surti (India) 1961-1969 28 2 832 99 32.00 0 7 2450 1302 26 5/74 50.07 1 87.5RJ Shastri (India) 1981-1992 forty nine 2 1738 206 36.ninety seven five6 4100 1917 35 four/seventy eight fifty four.seventy seven 0 83.6 C Kelleway (Aus) 1911-1928 24 2 903 147 41.04 3 3 1985 832 17 3/forty six forty eight.ninety four 0 eighty two.7 MA Noble (Aus) 1899-1909 53 3 1561 133 31.22 1 14 4352 1880 sixty one 7/17 30.81 2 eighty two.1 FMM Worrell (WI) 1948-1962 60 7 3248 261 61.28 917 4802 1902 47 7/70 40.forty six 2 eighty.0 M Prabhakar (India) 1984-1995 30 2 905 one hundred twenty 32.32 1 five2379 1165 35 5/104 33.28 1 seventy nine.3 RG Barlow (Eng) 1881-1887 21 1 403 62 20.15 0 1 1664 484 27 7/forty 17.92 three 79.2 SA Durani (India) 1961-1973 21 0 509 104 24.23 1 2 1562 674 26 6/seventy three 25.ninety two 1 74.3 RM Cowper (Aus) 1964-1968 39 1 1898 307 forty nine.94 five9 2821 1058 33 four/48 32.06 0 72.three
Travis Basevi is a cricket statistician and UK Senior Programmer for ESPNcricinfo and other ESPN sports websites. George Binoy is an Assistant Editor at ESPNcricinfo
© ESPN sports Media Ltd.
CALGARY, Alberta, Feb. 15, 2018 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- TransCanada agency (TSX:TRP) (NYSE:TRP) (TransCanada or the business) today introduced internet revenue caused by regular shares for fourth quarter 2017 of $861 million or $0.98 per share in comparison to a web loss of $358 million or $0.43 per share for a similar period in 2016. For the yr ended December 31, 2017, net revenue because of normal shares was $3.0 billion or $3.forty four per share compared to web income of $124 million or $0.16 per share in 2016. related income for fourth quarter 2017 were $719 million or $0.82 per typical share compared to $626 million or $0.seventy five per share for the same duration ultimate 12 months. For the year ended December 31, 2017, similar income have been $2.7 billion or $three.09 per common share compared to $2.1 billion or $2.78 per share in 2016. TransCanada's Board of administrators also declared a quarterly dividend of $0.sixty nine per typical share for the quarter ending March 31, 2018, such as $2.seventy six per normal share on an annualized basis, a rise of 10.four per cent. this is the eighteenth consecutive 12 months the Board of directors has raised the dividend.
"we're blissful that our vision of fitting certainly one of North america’s leading energy infrastructure companies is fitting a reality. In 2017, we superior a couple of strategic initiatives and delivered listing economic efficiency following the a hit integration of Columbia into our operations," noted Russ Girling, TransCanada’s president and chief government officer. "related profits per share extended eleven per cent in comparison to 2016 while related dollars generated from operations of $5.6 billion were 9 per cent higher than closing yr. The raises replicate the potent efficiency of our existing belongings and about $5 billion of increase tasks that had been accomplished and placed into carrier all the way through 2017. They protected expansions of our NGTL and Canadian Mainline methods in our Canadian herbal gasoline pipelines company, the Gibraltar and Rayne XPress initiatives in U.S. natural gas pipelines and the Grand Rapids and northerly Courier drinks pipelines in Alberta."
"looking ahead, we can proceed to advance a $23 billion close-term capital program, together with an extra $2.4 billion on NGTL. This software is anticipated to generate huge additional growth in profits and money move and support persisted annual dividend increase on the upper conclusion of an eight to ten per cent range via 2020 and an additional eight to ten per cent in 2021," added Girling. "we now have invested about $eight billion into these projects so far and are well placed to fund the remainder of this capital program through our amazing and growing internally generated cash circulate and access to capital markets on compelling terms."
"moreover, we proceed to improve more than $20 billion of medium to longer-time period initiatives together with Keystone XL, Coastal GasLink and the Bruce vigour life extension program. development on Keystone XL continues following the Nebraska Public provider commission approval of a plausible route throughout the state, which we help, and the receipt of commercial commitments for the venture. at the same time we expect to comfortable extra biological increase linked to our huge North American footprint in herbal gas pipelines, drinks pipelines and power technology as evidenced with the aid of ongoing expansions of the NGTL equipment. These initiatives highlight the potent competitive place of our asset base and our confirmed capability to continually fill up our boom portfolio with desirable, strategic, low-risk funding opportunities. Success in advancing these and other initiatives into building and operation might prolong our dividend increase outlook beyond 2021," concluded Girling.
(All financial figures are unaudited and in Canadian dollars unless noted otherwise)
• Fourth quarter 2017 fiscal effects:
• For the yr ended December 31, 2017:
• Fourth quarter highlights:
internet revenue as a result of average shares extended by using $1.2 billion or $1.41 per share to $861 million or $0.98 per share for the three months ended December 31, 2017 in comparison to the equal duration remaining year. Fourth quarter 2017 effects protected an $804 million recuperation of deferred profits taxes on account of U.S. Tax Reform, a $136 million after- tax gain related to the sale of our Ontario photo voltaic assets and a $64 million after-tax internet profit concerning the monetization of our U.S. Northeast power enterprise. These features have been partly offset by way of a $954 million after-tax impairment charge for the power East pipeline and linked tasks on account of our determination now not to proceed with the venture applications and a $9 million after-tax cost concerning the upkeep and liquidation of Keystone XL belongings which have been expensed pending additional advancement of the project. All of those specific gadgets, in addition to unrealized positive aspects and losses from alterations in chance management activities, are excluded from comparable salary.
internet profits caused by common shares for the 12 months ended December 31, 2017 became $3.0 billion or $three.44 per share in comparison to $124 million or $0.sixteen per share in 2016. web salary per regular share contains the dilutive effect of issuing 161 million ordinary shares in 2016 and common shares issued below our DRP and company ATM program in 2017. consequences in 2017 included an $804 million recuperation of deferred profits taxes on account of U.S. Tax Reform, a $307 million after-tax net profit involving the monetization of our U.S. Northeast power enterprise and a $136 million after-tax benefit concerning the sale of our Ontario solar belongings. These gadgets were in part offset via a $954 million after-tax impairment charge for the energy East pipeline and related projects on account of our determination no longer to proceed with the challenge functions, a $69 million after-tax cost for integration-linked fees associated with the acquisition of Columbia, a $28 million after-tax cost regarding the renovation and liquidation of Keystone XL belongings that have been expensed pending further development of the venture and a $7 million earnings tax restoration in first quarter regarding the realized loss on a third birthday party sale of Keystone XL undertaking belongings. All of these certain items, as well as unrealized features and losses from alterations in possibility administration activities, are excluded from comparable revenue.
similar salary for fourth quarter 2017 have been $719 million or $0.eighty two per share in comparison to $626 million or $0.seventy five per share for the same duration in 2016, a rise of $ninety three million or $0.07 per share. The increase in fourth quarter similar revenue changed into essentially due to the net impact of a stronger contribution from U.S. herbal gas Pipelines as a result of lower operating costs including synergies performed from the Columbia acquisition, a better contribution from liquids Pipelines basically as a result of bigger volumes on Keystone, the graduation of operations on Northern Courier and Grand Rapids and beverages advertising actions, larger earnings from Bruce power particularly because of higher volumes as a consequence of fewer outage days, and higher AFUDC on our expense-regulated U.S. natural fuel pipelines, partly offset via our choice no longer to proceed with the power East pipeline, a lessen contribution from U.S. vigour due to the monetization of our U.S. Northeast power generation property in 2d quarter 2017 and the continued wind-down of our U.S. energy advertising and marketing operations and an after-tax impairment charge in 2017 regarding out of date power machine.
comparable revenue for the year ended December 31, 2017 of $2.7 billion or $3.09 per share have been $582 million or $0.31 per common share greater than in 2016 and contains the dilutive effect of issuing 161 million typical shares in 2016 and common shares issued under our DRP and company ATM software in 2017. The 2017 raise in comparable earnings was basically the net influence of a much better contribution from U.S. herbal gas Pipelines because of incremental income from Columbia following the July 2016 acquisition and higher ANR transportation revenue on account of a FERC-authorised expense contract, increased earnings from liquids Pipelines essentially because of better volumes on the Keystone Pipeline system, drinks advertising actions and the commencement of operations on Grand Rapids and northern Courier, higher profits from Bruce energy peculiarly due to higher volumes because of fewer outage days, a far better contribution from Mexico natural gas Pipelines because of income from Topolobampo beginning in July 2016 and Mazatlán starting in December 2016, better AFUDC on our expense-regulated U.S. natural fuel pipelines, the NGTL gadget, Tula and Villa de Reyes, partially offset through the commercial in-carrier of Topolobampo and completion of Mazatlán construction, and better hobby salary and different because of salary concerning Coastal GasLink mission expenses and the termination of the PRGT project. These gadgets were partially offset by way of lower contributions from U.S. power as a result of the sales of our U.S. Northeast energy generation property in 2d quarter 2017 and the wind-down of our U.S. vigour advertising operations, as well as better interest cost because of debt assumed in the acquisition of Columbia on July 1, 2016 and lengthy-term debt and junior subordinated notice issuances in 2017, internet of maturities.
outstanding contemporary tendencies encompass:
Canadian natural gas Pipelines:
On December 28, 2017, the NEB approved the Sundre Crossover project on the NGTL equipment. The approximate $100 million assignment will increase delivery of 245 TJ/d (229 MMcf/d) to the Alberta / British Columbia border to join with TransCanada downstream pipelines. In-provider is planned for April 1, 2018.
U.S. herbal gasoline Pipelines:
Mexico natural fuel Pipelines:
In January 2018, TransCanada introduced that we secured about 500,000 barrels per day of company, 20- year commitments, following an open season in 2017, positioning the proposed project to proceed. The enterprise will look to proceed to cozy further long-time period contracted volumes. we're additionally carrying on with an outreach application within the communities where the pipeline may be developed and are working collaboratively with landowners in an open and clear approach to reap the vital easements for the approved route. building instruction has commenced and should enhance as the permitting manner advances all over 2018. basic construction is expected to begin in 2019 and should take about two years to complete.
On November 16, 2017, the Keystone pipeline become quickly shut down after a leak become detected in Marshall County, South Dakota. On November 29, 2017, the pipeline became repaired and again to provider at a decreased force within the affected component to the pipeline. additional investigative activities and corrective measures required by way of the Pipeline and hazardous materials security Administration (PHMSA) are planned for 2018. This shutdown did not have a big influence on our 2017 income.
Teleconference and Webcast:
we can dangle a teleconference and webcast on Thursday, February 15, 2018 to talk about our fourth quarter 2017 and year-end financial consequences. Russ Girling, TransCanada President and Chief govt Officer, and Don Marchand, govt Vice-President and Chief financial Officer, along with different members of the TransCanada government leadership team, will talk about the monetary results and enterprise traits at 2 p.m. (MST) / 4 p.m. (EST).
contributors of the funding neighborhood and different involved parties are invited to participate by calling 800.273.9672 or 416.340.2216 (Toronto area). No pass code is required. Please dial in 10 minutes previous to the beginning of the call. A reside webcast of the teleconference will be obtainable at www.transcanada.com.
A replay of the teleconference can be attainable two hours after the conclusion of the call unless midnight (EST) on February 22, 2018. Please call 800.408.3053 or 905.694.9451 (Toronto enviornment) and enter move code 2578190#.
The audited annual Consolidated economic Statements and administration’s discussion and analysis (MD&A) are available below TransCanada's profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com, with the U.S. Securities and alternate fee on EDGAR at www.sec.gov/data/edgar.shtml and on the TransCanada site at www.transcanada.com.
With more than sixty five years' journey, TransCanada is a pacesetter within the responsible development and official operation of North American power infrastructure including natural fuel and drinks pipelines, energy era and gas storage facilities. TransCanada operates some of the biggest herbal gas transmission networks that extends more than ninety one,900 kilometres (57,one hundred miles), tapping into basically all fundamental gasoline supply basins in North the united states. TransCanada is a number one company of gasoline storage and connected services with 653 billion cubic feet of storage ability. a huge impartial power producer, TransCanada at present owns or has pastimes in approximately 6,100 megawatts of vigor technology in Canada and the USA. TransCanada is also the developer and operator of 1 of North the united states's main beverages pipeline techniques that extends approximately four,900 kilometres (three,000 miles) connecting growing to be continental oil components to key markets and refineries. TransCanada's typical shares alternate on the Toronto and ny stock exchanges under the image TRP. seek advice from TransCanada.com to be taught extra, or connect with us on social media and 3BL Media.
Media Enquiries:Mark Cooper / Grady Semmens403.920.7859 or 800.608.7859
Investor & Analyst Enquiries: David Moneta / Stuart Kampel403.920.7911 or 800.361.6522
Fourth quarter 2017 financial highlightsthree months endedDecember 31 yr endedDecember 31 (unaudited - tens of millions of $, except per share amounts) 2017 2016 2017 2016 earnings Revenues 3,617 3,635 13,449 12,547 net earnings/(loss) attributable to average shares 861 (358 ) 2,997 124 per commonplace share - fundamental $0.ninety eight ($0.forty three ) $three.44 $0.16 - diluted $0.98 ($0.43 ) $3.forty three $0.sixteen comparable EBITDA1 1,903 1,890 7,377 6,647 similar earnings1 719 626 2,690 2,108 per standard share1 $0.82 $0.75 $three.09 $2.seventy eight operating cash circulate net money supplied by operations 1,390 1,575 5,230 5,069 related funds generated from operations1 1,450 1,425 5,641 5,171 related distributable cash flow1 - reflecting all upkeep capital bills 727 928 three,599 3,541 - reflecting most effective non-recoverable preservation capital expenses 1,268 1,251 4,963 four,482 comparable distributable money movement per regular share1 - reflecting all upkeep capital expenses $0.83 $1.12 $4.13 $four.sixty seven - reflecting only non-recoverable preservation capital charges $1.forty five $1.50 $5.sixty nine $5.91 Investing actions Capital spending2 2,552 2,016 9,210 6,067 Acquisitions, net of money bought — — — 13,608 Proceeds from sales of property, internet of transaction expenses 1,170 — 5,317 6 Dividends declared per typical share $0.625 $0.565 $2.50 $2.26 fundamental commonplace shares stunning (thousands and thousands) - weighted average 877 832 872 759 - issued and spectacular 881 864 881 864 1 related EBITDA, similar profits, similar salary per usual share, similar money generated from operations, comparable distributable cash circulate and similar distributable cash movement per regular share are all non-GAAP measures. See the non-GAAP measures part for extra assistance. 2 includes capital bills, capital initiatives in construction and contributions to equity investments.
forward-searching INFORMATIONWe expose ahead-searching assistance to assist existing and talents traders be aware administration’s assessment of our future plans and economic outlook, and our future potentialities typical.
Statements which are ahead-searching are in line with certain assumptions and on what we know and predict today. These statements generally consist of words like expect, predict, consider, may additionally, will, may still, estimate or other an identical phrases.
ahead-looking statements in this information unencumber consist of tips in regards to the following, among different issues:
ahead-searching statements do not guarantee future performance. specific movements and outcomes may well be enormously diverse as a result of assumptions, dangers or uncertainties related to our enterprise or routine that turn up after the date of this news release.
Our forward-searching information is in accordance with right here key assumptions, and is area to right here dangers and uncertainties:
dangers and uncertainties
you could examine extra about these factors and others in stories we now have filed with Canadian securities regulators and the SEC, together with the MD&A in our 2016 Annual file.
As exact effects could vary tremendously from the ahead-searching suggestions, remember to now not put undue reliance on forward-searching suggestions and may now not use future-oriented suggestions or economic outlooks for anything other than their intended intention. We do not update our ahead-looking statements due to new tips or future movements, except we're required to via legislations.
FOR greater INFORMATIONYou can discover greater counsel about TransCanada in our Annual information kind and different disclosure documents, which can be found on SEDAR (www.sedar.com).
NON-GAAP MEASURESThis news unlock references here non-GAAP measures:
These measures will not have any standardized which means as prescribed with the aid of GAAP and for this reason may also no longer be corresponding to measures presented by means of other entities.
similar measuresWe calculate related measures by means of adjusting definite GAAP and non-GAAP measures for certain items we believe are huge however no longer reflective of our underlying operations within the period. except as in any other case described herein, these related measures are calculated on a constant foundation from period to duration and are adjusted for selected gadgets in every period, as applicable.
Our choice to regulate for a selected item is subjective and made after careful consideration. certain items might also encompass:
We exclude the unrealized good points and losses from changes within the reasonable cost of derivatives used to cut back our publicity to definite fiscal and commodity rate dangers. These derivatives often give positive financial hedges, but don't meet the criteria for hedge accounting. because of this, the changes in reasonable value are recorded in web profits. As these quantities don't accurately replicate the features and losses that may be realized at settlement, we do not believe them reflective of our underlying operations.
right here desk identifies our non-GAAP measures in opposition t their equivalent GAAP measures.related measure normal measurecomparable profits internet profits/(loss) as a result of general stocksrelated salary per normal share web revenue/(loss) per general percentagecomparable EBITDA segmented salary/(losses) similar EBIT segmented salary/(losses) related money generated from operations web money supplied by means of operations similar distributable money flow net cash supplied by operations
related revenue and similar revenue per shareComparable income represents salary or loss attributable to usual shareholders on a consolidated foundation adjusted for particular gadgets. related salary is created from segmented earnings, activity cost, AFUDC, pastime revenue and different, profits taxes and non-controlling interests adjusted for the selected gadgets. See the reconciliation of web salary to related salary.
similar EBIT and comparable EBITDAComparable EBIT represents segmented earnings adjusted for the particular objects described above. We use similar EBIT as a measure of our income from ongoing operations because it is a positive measure of our performance and a pretty good device for evaluating traits in each and every phase. similar EBITDA is calculated the identical method as related EBIT but excludes the non-cash costs for depreciation and amortization. See the reconciliation of non-GAAP measures for a reconciliation to segmented profits.
money generated from operations and similar dollars generated from operationsFunds generated from operations displays net cash provided by operations earlier than changes in operating working capital. We trust it's a constructive measure of our consolidated operating money circulate because it does not encompass fluctuations from working capital balances, which do not necessarily reflect underlying operations within the identical length, and is used to supply a constant measure of the money generating efficiency of our belongings. comparable funds generated from operations is adjusted for the money affect of particular items referred to above. See the related distributable money movement part for the reconciliation to internet cash offered by using operations.
related distributable cash stream and comparable distributable cash circulation per shareWe trust similar distributable cash movement is a useful supplemental measure of performance that defines cash accessible to average shareholders before capital allocation. related distributable money move is defined as comparable money generated from operations less preferred share dividends, distributions to non-controlling pastimes and renovation capital bills. preservation capital fees are expenses incurred to hold our working skill, asset integrity and reliability, and encompass amounts as a result of our proportionate share of protection capital charges on our fairness investments. See the comparable distributable money circulate section for the reconciliation to net money provided by using operations.
youngsters we deduct protection capital fees in deciding on related distributable cash circulation, we now have the skill to get well the bulk of those fees in Canadian herbal gas Pipelines, U.S. herbal gasoline Pipelines and liquids Pipelines. Canadian herbal gasoline pipelines preservation capital fees are mirrored in cost bases, on which we earn a regulated return and as a result recuperate in tolls. nearly all of our U.S. natural gasoline pipelines can are trying to find to get well preservation capital charges through prices based in future expense instances or expense settlements. As such, these protection capital charges are effortlessly recovered in the equal manner as enlargement capital fees. Tolling preparations in drinks Pipelines supply for recovery of protection capital.
effective December 31, 2017, we amended our presentation of related distributable money circulate and comparable distributable money flow per share as an instance the influence of except recoverable renovation capital charges from their respective calculations. we now have covered comparable distributable cash circulate and comparative distributable cash move per share for 2016 to mirror the amended presentation layout which we believe provides better tips for readers.
Consolidated outcomes - fourth quarter 2017
We operate in three core organizations - herbal gas Pipelines, beverages Pipelines and power. with a view to give suggestions it truly is aligned with how management selections about our enterprise are made and how performance of our business is assessed, our effects are reflected in five working segments: Canadian herbal gas Pipelines, U.S. herbal gas Pipelines, Mexico natural gas Pipelines, drinks Pipelines and energy. We also have a non-operational company segment which includes company and administrative services that give governance and different help to our operational business segments.
certain costs prior to now stated in our company phase at the moment are being said within the company segments to superior align with how we measure our financial performance. 2016 outcomes have been adjusted to reflect this exchange.three months endedDecember 31 year endedDecember 31 (unaudited - hundreds of thousands of $, apart from per share amounts) 2017 2016 2017 2016 Canadian natural gas Pipelines 333 364 1,236 1,307 U.S. natural fuel Pipelines 461 403 1,760 1,190 Mexico natural fuel Pipelines ninety three 103 426 287 beverages Pipelines (932 ) 213 (251 ) 806 energy 472 (574 ) 1,552 (1,157 ) corporate sixty three (33 ) (39 ) (120 ) complete segmented earnings 490 476 4,684 2,313 interest price (541 ) (542 ) (2,069 ) (1,998 ) Allowance for dollars used throughout building 140 97 507 419 pastime profits and other (9 ) (15 ) 184 103 revenue before profits taxes 80 sixteen three,306 837 income tax restoration/(cost) 870 (274 ) 89 (352 ) web salary/(loss) 950 (258 ) three,395 485 internet income because of non-controlling interests (49 ) (68 ) (238 ) (252 ) net revenue/(loss) because of controlling pastimes 901 (326 ) 3,157 233 favored share dividends (40 ) (32 ) (160 ) (109 ) net earnings/(loss) brought on by standard shares 861 (358 ) 2,997 124 internet income/(loss) per regular share - simple $0.ninety eight ($0.43 ) $three.forty four $0.sixteen - diluted $0.ninety eight ($0.forty three ) $three.forty three $0.sixteen
internet revenue/(loss) because of standard shares improved through $1,219 million or $1.41 per share for the three months ended December 31, 2017 compared to the equal duration in 2016 due to the changes in internet salary described beneath, as neatly as the dilutive effect of issuing 60 million average shares within the fourth quarter of 2016 and customary shares issued beneath our DRP and company ATM program in 2017.
Fourth quarter 2017 results covered:
Fourth quarter 2016 results covered:
net income in all durations blanketed unrealized positive factors and losses from adjustments in possibility management actions which we exclude, along with the above-stated gadgets, to arrive at similar revenue. A reconciliation of net income/(loss) brought on by common shares to related revenue is shown in the following table.
RECONCILIATION OF net income/(LOSS) TO similar earningsthree months endedDecember 31 yr endedDecember 31 (unaudited - millions of $, apart from per share quantities) 2017 2016 2017 2016 internet income/(loss) brought on by normal shares 861 (358 ) 2,997 124 certain items (internet of tax): U.S. Tax Reform adjustment (804 ) — (804 ) — gain on sale of Ontario solar belongings (136 ) — (136 ) — net (gain)/loss on sales of U.S. Northeast power belongings (64 ) 870 (307 ) 873 energy East impairment charge 954 — 954 — Keystone XL asset expenses 9 18 28 forty two Integration and acquisition related prices – Columbia — sixty seven sixty nine 273 Keystone XL earnings tax recoveries — — (7 ) (28 ) Ravenswood goodwill impairment — — — 656 Alberta PPA terminations and contract — 68 — 244 Restructuring fees — 6 — sixteen TC Offshore loss on sale — — — three chance management activities1 (one hundred and one ) (forty five ) (104 ) (ninety five ) comparable profits 719 626 2,690 2,108 web earnings/(loss) per commonplace share $0.ninety eight ($0.forty three ) $3.forty four $0.16 particular objects (web of tax): U.S. Tax Reform adjustment (0.92 ) — (0.92 ) — profit on sale of Ontario photo voltaic belongings (0.sixteen ) — (0.sixteen ) — internet loss/(gain) on sales of U.S. Northeast power belongings (0.08 ) 1.05 (0.34 ) 1.15 power East impairment charge 1.09 — 1.09 — Keystone XL asset prices 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.06 Integration and acquisition related charges – Columbia — 0.08 0.08 0.37 Keystone XL profits tax recoveries — — (0.01 ) (0.04 ) Ravenswood goodwill impairment — — — 0.86 Alberta PPA terminations and contract — 0.08 — 0.32 Restructuring costs — 0.01 — 0.02 risk management actions (0.10 ) (0.06 ) (0.12 ) (0.12 ) comparable income per usual share $0.eighty two $0.75 $three.09 $2.78 1 risk management activities three months endedDecember 31 12 months endedDecember 31 (unaudited - hundreds of thousands of $) 2017 2016 2017 2016 Canadian power6 1 11 four U.S. power136 97 39 113 beverages advertising 15 4 — (2 ) natural gasoline garage7 (1 ) 12 eight interest price — — (1 ) — overseas alternate (1 ) (23 ) 88 26 salary tax caused by risk management actions (sixty two ) (33 ) (45 ) (fifty four ) complete unrealized features from possibility administration activities 101 45 104 95
comparable salary extended through $93 million or $0.07 per share for the three months ended December 31, 2017 compared to the identical period in 2016 and become basically the net effect of:
U.S. TAX REFORM
On December 22, 2017, H.R. 1, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (U.S. Tax Reform or the Act) became signed, resulting in large changes to U.S. tax law, including a reduce in the U.S. federal company earnings tax cost from 35 per cent to 21 per cent beneficial January 1, 2018. as a result of this exchange, we have remeasured latest deferred revenue tax belongings and deferred income tax liabilities concerning our U.S. organizations to replicate the new lessen profits tax cost as at December 31, 2017.
For our organizations in the U.S. no longer subject to fee-regulated accounting (RRA), the reduction in enacted tax quotes has been recorded as a lower in internet deferred income tax liabilities and revenue tax fee, leading to a rise in internet profits as a result of common shares in the fourth quarter and for the yr ended December 31, 2017 within the volume of $816 million.
For our groups in the U.S. subject to RRA, we are expecting the reduce salary tax fees to have an effect on future fee surroundings procedures and have therefore identified a internet regulatory legal responsibility with a corresponding reduction in web deferred revenue tax liabilities within the volume of $1,686 million. These regulatory liabilities can be amortized to profits over time.
internet deferred profits tax liabilities concerning the cumulative remeasurements of worker publish-retirement merits included in accumulated different complete revenue have also been adjusted with a corresponding raise in deferred revenue tax price of $12 million.
Given the significance of the law, the Securities and exchange fee (SEC) issued suggestions which permits registrants to list provisional amounts which could be adjusted as tips turns into obtainable, prepared or analyzed all the way through a dimension duration now not to exceed one year.
The SEC counsel summarizes a three-step process to be utilized at every reporting length to establish: (1) where the accounting is complete; (2) provisional quantities where the accounting is not yet complete, however an inexpensive estimate has been decided; and (three) the place an inexpensive estimate cannot yet be decided and hence profits taxes are mirrored in accordance with law prior to the enactment of the Act.
At December 31, 2017, we trust all quantities recorded concerning U.S. Tax Reform to be most economical estimates that are provisional, as our interpretation, assessment and presentation of the influence of the tax legislations trade, notably as it has been utilized to our groups subject to RRA, may be additional clarified with further suggestions from regulatory, tax and accounting authorities. should extra tips be supplied via these authorities or other sources during the one-12 months dimension duration, we are able to assessment the provisional quantities and regulate as acceptable.
on account of the decrease U.S. revenue tax fees protected as a part of the Act, we expect a modest raise to 2018 profits. moreover the discount in statutory quotes, longer-term there are several other provisions within the new legislations which may additionally have an impact on us prospectively, including alterations to the expensing of depreciable property, boundaries to activity deductions, the creation of Base Erosion Anti-Abuse Tax together with definite exemptions for fee-regulated groups. We proceed to consider the have an effect on of these and different provisions of the Act.
we are developing nice tasks under our capital program. These lengthy-existence infrastructure property are supported via long-term industrial arrangements with creditworthy counterparties or regulated enterprise models and are anticipated to generate giant growth in earnings and cash movement.
Our capital application contains about $23 billion of close-time period initiatives and about $24 billion of commercially supported medium to longer-time period projects. amounts presented exclude preservation capital costs, capitalized hobby and AFUDC.
All projects are area to can charge changes as a result of market conditions, route refinement, allowing circumstances, scheduling and timing of regulatory permits.
near-time period initiatives(unaudited - billions of $) expected in-service date Estimated undertaking can charge Carrying value atDecember 31, 2017 Canadian herbal fuel Pipelines Canadian Mainline 2018-2021 0.2 — NGTL system 2018 0.6 0.2 2019 2.3 0.three 2020 1.6 0.1 2021 2.7 — united statesnatural gasoline Pipelines Columbia gas Leach XPress1 2018 US 1.6 US 1.fiveWB XPress 2018 US 0.eight US 0.four Mountaineer XPress 2018 US 2.6 US 0.fiveModernization II 2018-2020 US 1.1 US 0.1 Buckeye XPress 2020 US 0.2 — Columbia Gulf Cameron access 2018 US 0.3 US 0.three Gulf XPress 2018 US 0.6 US 0.2 Other2 2018-2020 US 0.three — Mexico natural gasoline Pipelines Sur de Texas3 2018 US 1.three US 1.0 Villa de Reyes 2018 US 0.8 US 0.5Tula 2019 US 0.7 US 0.fivebeverages Pipelines White Spruce 2019 0.2 — energy Napanee 2018 1.three 0.9Bruce vigor – lifestyles extension4 up to 2020 0.nine0.three 20.1 6.eight international change have an effect on on near-term projects5 2.6 1.three total close-term projects (billions of Cdn$) 22.7 8.1
1 Leach XPress changed into positioned in carrier in January 2018.2 reflects our proportionate share of expenses related to Portland Xpress and various expansion tasks.3 Our proportionate share.four quantity reflects our proportionate share of the closing capital prices that Bruce energy expects to incur on its existence extension funding programs in advance of the Unit 6 foremost refurbishment outage which is anticipated to begin in 2020.5 displays U.S./Canada foreign exchange price of 1.25 at December 31, 2017.
Medium to longer-time period projectsThe medium to longer-term tasks have more advantageous uncertainty with recognize to timing and estimated venture charges. The expected in-service dates of these projects are publish-2020, and costs offered in the schedule under mirror probably the most contemporary fees for each and every project as filed with the applicable regulatory authorities or otherwise determined. These initiatives are field to approvals that consist of FID and/or complicated regulatory approaches, although, every assignment has business help except the place noted.(unaudited – billions of $) phase Estimated mission cost Carrying cost at December 31, 2017 Heartland and TC Terminals1 beverages Pipelines 0.nine0.1 Grand Rapids section 22 beverages Pipelines 0.7 — Bruce vigour–existence extension2 calories5.three — Keystone tasks Keystone XL3 beverages Pipelines US eight.0 US 0.3 Keystone Hardisty Terminal1,three beverages Pipelines 0.3 0.1 BC west coast LNG-linked initiatives Coastal GasLink Canadian natural gasoline Pipelines four.eight 0.four NGTL system – Merrick Canadian natural gasoline Pipelines 1.9 — 21.nine0.9international change have an effect on on medium to longer-term projects4 2.0 0.1 complete medium to longer-time period initiatives (billions of Cdn$) 23.nine1.0
1 Regulatory approvals had been obtained, additional business aid is being pursued.2 Our proportionate share.three Carrying value displays volume last after impairment can charge recorded in 2015.4 reflects U.S./Canada international alternate fee of 1.25 at December 31, 2017.
Canadian natural fuel Pipelines
here is a reconciliation of comparable EBITDA and similar EBIT (our non-GAAP measures) to segmented profits (the equivalent GAAP measure). certain charges previously said in our corporate segment are actually being mentioned inside the business segments to greater align with how we measure our monetary performance. 2016 effects have been adjusted to mirror this change.three months ended yr ended December 31 December 31 (unaudited – tens of millions of $) 2017 2016 2017 2016 NGTL gadget 274 255 996 968 Canadian Mainline 269 305 1,043 1,one zero five different Canadian pipelines1 29 27 a hundred and ten 116 enterprise development (3 ) (three ) (5 ) (7 ) related EBITDA 569 584 2,one hundred forty four 2,182 Depreciation and amortization (236 ) (220 ) (908 ) (875 ) related EBIT and segmented income 333 364 1,236 1,307
1 comprises consequences from Foothills, Ventures LP, wonderful Lakes Canada, our share of fairness profits from our investment in TQM, and everyday and administration fees regarding our Canadian Pipelines.
Canadian herbal gasoline Pipelines segmented salary diminished by means of $31 million for the three months ended December 31, 2017 in comparison to the equal duration in 2016 and are similar to comparable EBIT.
web income and comparable EBITDA for our expense-regulated Canadian herbal gas Pipelines are generally suffering from our accredited ROE, our investment base, our degree of deemed average equity and incentive income. changes in depreciation, monetary fees and profits taxes also affect related EBITDA however wouldn't have a major have an impact on on internet earnings as they are basically absolutely recovered in salary on a movement-via foundation.
internet income - NGTL system AND CANADIAN MAINLINEthree months endedDecember 31 yr endedDecember 31 (unaudited – millions of $) 2017 2016 2017 2016 NGTL equipment ninety one eighty five 352 318 Canadian Mainline 50 fifty four 199 208
net income for the NGTL system multiplied through $6 million for the three months ended December 31, 2017 in comparison to the equal duration in 2016 chiefly because of a higher normal funding base, partially offset by using reduce OM&A incentive earnings. The NGTL gadget operated under both-year 2016-2017 salary Requirement agreement which included an ROE of 10.1 per cent on 40 per cent deemed equity and a mechanism for sharing variances between actual and a fixed OM&A quantity.
Canadian Mainline's internet income reduced through $four million for the three months ended December 31, 2017 compared to the equal length in 2016 basically because of a lessen usual investment base and lower incentive profits. The Canadian Mainline is working under the NEB 2014 determination which comprises an accepted ROE of 10.1 per cent on a 40 per cent deemed equity with a probable latitude of achieved outcomes between 8.7 per cent and 11.5 per cent. The choice additionally comprises an incentive mechanism that has each upside and draw back risk and a $20 million annual after-tax contribution from TransCanada.
DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATIONDepreciation and amortization elevated by means of $sixteen million for the three months ended December 31, 2017 compared to the identical period in 2016 specially as a result of facilities that were positioned in carrier for the NGTL equipment and Canadian Mainline.
operating records - NGTL system AND CANADIAN MAINLINEyear ended December 31 NGTL System1 Canadian Mainline2 (unaudited) 2017 2016 2017 2016 usual funding base (thousands and thousands of $) 8,385 7,451 4,184 4,441 delivery volumes (Bcf): complete4,153 four,055 1,620 1,634 standard per day eleven.four 11.1 four.four four.5
1 box receipt volumes for the NGTL gadget for the year ended December 31, 2017 have been 4,224 Bcf (2016 – four,117 Bcf). commonplace per day was eleven.6 Bcf (2016 – eleven.three Bcf).2 Canadian Mainline’s throughput volumes characterize physical deliveries to home and export markets. actual receipts originating at the Alberta border and in Saskatchewan for the yr ended December 31, 2017 were 1,019 Bcf (2016 – 1,055 Bcf). ordinary per day became 2.eight Bcf (2016 – 2.9 Bcf).
U.S. natural gas Pipelines
here is a reconciliation of similar EBITDA and comparable EBIT (our non-GAAP measures) to segmented salary (the equivalent GAAP measure). certain prices previously mentioned in our company segment are now being reported inside the company segments to more desirable align with how we measure our economic efficiency. 2016 consequences were adjusted to reflect this trade.three months endedDecember 31 12 months endedDecember 31 (unaudited - millions of US$, unless otherwise noted) 2017 2016 2017 2016 Columbia Gas1 177 146 623 269 ANR ninety nine 88 400 321 TC PipeLines, LP2,three 27 28 110 118 Midstream1 23 14 93 forty Columbia Gulf1 21 14 seventy six 25 splendid Lakes3,four 15 12 64 60 different U.S. pipelines1,2,three,five30 28 108 74 Non-controlling interests6 84 one zero one 341 365 company development (1 ) (1 ) (2 ) (3 ) similar EBITDA 475 430 1,813 1,269 Depreciation and amortization (113 ) (118 ) (453 ) (322 ) related EBIT 362 312 1,360 947 international exchange have an impact on ninety nine 102 410 310 comparable EBIT (Cdn$) 461 414 1,770 1,257 specific objects: Integration and acquisition related charges – Columbia — (11 ) (10 ) (sixty three ) TC Offshore loss on sale — — — (four ) Segmented revenue (Cdn$) 461 403 1,760 1,one hundred ninety
1 We achieved the acquisition of Columbia on July 1, 2016. results reflect our effective possession in these belongings from that date.2 consequences from Northern Border and Iroquois replicate our share of equity revenue from these investments. We obtained further interests in Iroquois of 4.87 per cent on March 31, 2016 and nil.sixty five per cent on may 1, 2016. TC PipeLines, LP obtained 49.34 per cent of our 50 per cent pastime in Iroquois on June 1, 2017. On January 1, 2016, we offered a forty nine.9 per cent direct interest in PNGTS to TC PipeLines, LP and its last eleven.81 per cent pastime to TC PipeLines, LP on June 1, 2017.three TC PipeLines, LP periodically conducts at-the-market equity issuances which reduce our possession in TC PipeLines, LP. right here indicates our possession hobby in TC PipeLines, LP and our effective possession activity of outstanding Lakes and PNGTS through our possession interest in TC PipeLines, LP at the date offered.effective ownership percent as of December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016 TC PipeLines, LP 25.7 26.eight valuable ownership via TC PipeLines, LP: amazing Lakes eleven.nine12.fivePNGTS 15.913.four
four Represents our fifty three.6 per cent direct hobby in first rate Lakes. The final 46.4 per cent is held by way of TC PipeLines, LP.5 contains our direct ownership in Iroquois and PNGTS (until June 1, 2017), our valuable ownership in Millennium and Hardy Storage, and widespread and administrative fees concerning U.S. natural gas property. 6 comparable EBITDA for the portions of TC PipeLines, LP, PNGTS (until June 1, 2017) and CPPL that we do not personal. valuable February 17, 2017, we acquired the last publicly held contraptions of CPPL.
U.S. natural gas Pipelines segmented income improved via $58 million for the three months ended December 31, 2017 in comparison to the identical length in 2016. Segmented income for the three months ended December 31, 2016 covered pre-tax fees of $eleven million specifically concerning retention and severance expenses because of the Columbia acquisition. These amounts had been excluded from our calculation of similar EBIT.
income from our U.S. herbal fuel Pipelines operations, which consist of Columbia effective July 1, 2016, are often affected by contracted quantity degrees, volumes delivered and the rates charged as well as through the charge of proposing functions. Columbia and ANR consequences are also affected by the contracting and pricing of their storage ability and commodity revenue. Transmission and storage revenues are often greater in iciness months as a result of expanded seasonal demand for our services.
comparable EBITDA for U.S. herbal gas Pipelines improved by using US$45 million for the three months ended December 31, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016. This become basically because of reduce working prices together with synergies completed from the Columbia acquisition.
DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATIONDepreciation and amortization decreased by way of US$5 million for the three months ended December 31, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016 primarily due to reasonable value changes regarding our Midstream belongings recorded in fourth quarter 2016.
Mexico natural gasoline Pipelines
here is a reconciliation of similar EBITDA and related EBIT (our non-GAAP measures) to segmented income (the equal GAAP measure). certain expenses previously said in our corporate segment are now being said within the enterprise segments to enhanced align with how we measure our monetary performance. 2016 outcomes had been adjusted to mirror this trade.three months ended December 31 year ended December 31 (unaudited – tens of millions of US$, except in any other case noted) 2017 2016 2017 2016 Topolobampo 38 forty one 157 eighty one Tamazunchale 27 26 112 105 Guadalajara 17 18 sixty eight 67 Mazatlán sixteen 5 sixty five 5 Sur de Texas1 (6 ) — eight — different (1 ) (3 ) (11 ) (3 ) business construction — (1 ) — (5 ) related EBITDA 91 86 399 250 Depreciation and amortization (18 ) (12 ) (seventy two ) (35 ) similar EBIT 73 seventy four 327 215 international change influence 20 29 ninety nine 72 comparable EBIT and segmented income (Cdn$) ninety three 103 426 287
1 Represents our 60 per cent equity pastime in a joint venture with IEnova to construct, personal and operate the Sur de Texas pipeline.
Mexico herbal fuel Pipelines segmented earnings reduced by $10 million for the three months ended December 31, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016 and are corresponding to related EBIT. aside from the industrial elements outlined under, a weaker U.S. dollar had a poor impact on the Canadian dollar equal segmented profits from our Mexico operations.
income from our Mexico operations are underpinned by means of lengthy-time period, strong, basically U.S. greenback-denominated revenue contracts, and are suffering from the can charge of offering provider.
comparable EBITDA for Mexico natural gas Pipelines elevated with the aid of US$5 million for the three months December 31, 2017 compared to the equal period in 2016 and became the internet impact of:
DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATIONDepreciation and amortization expanded by using US$6 million for the three months ended December 31, 2017 compared to the identical period in 2016 primarily as a result of the commencement of depreciation on Mazatlán.
right here is a reconciliation of similar EBITDA and similar EBIT (our non-GAAP measures) to segmented revenue (the equal GAAP measure). definite prices up to now reported in our company phase are now being mentioned inside the enterprise segments to stronger align with how we measure our financial performance. 2016 results were adjusted to mirror this change.three months endedDecember 31 12 months endedDecember 31 (unaudited – thousands and thousands of $) 2017 2016 2017 2016 Keystone Pipeline system 346 296 1,283 1,one hundred fifty five Intra-Alberta pipelines 29 — 33 — other services1 26 6 32 (three ) related EBITDA 401 302 1,348 1,152 Depreciation and amortization (eighty one ) (seventy eight ) (309 ) (292 ) comparable EBIT 320 224 1,039 860 particular gadgets: energy East impairment charge (1,256 ) — (1,256 ) — Keystone XL asset fees (eleven ) (15 ) (34 ) (fifty two ) risk administration actions 15 4 — (2 ) Segmented (losses)/earnings (932 ) 213 (251 ) 806 comparable EBIT denominated as follows: Canadian dollars80 sixty three 255 223 U.S. dollars188 122 604 482 foreign exchange have an effect on fifty two 39 one hundred eighty a hundred and fifty five 320 224 1,039 860
1 contains essentially beverages advertising and enterprise building actions.
drinks Pipelines segmented revenue lowered with the aid of $1,a hundred forty five million for the three months ended December 31, 2017 in comparison to the equal duration in 2016. This was primarily the web effect of a $1,256 million pre-tax impairment charge for the energy East pipeline and linked initiatives, $eleven million (2016 - $15 million) of pre-tax prices concerning Keystone XL for the preservation and liquidation of venture property that have been expensed pending extra advancement of the task, and unrealized positive factors from adjustments in the fair price of derivatives involving our beverages marketing business. These quantities had been excluded from our calculation of comparable EBIT.
Keystone Pipeline device revenue are generated essentially by using providing pipeline potential to shippers for fastened month-to-month payments that are not linked to exact throughput volumes. Uncontracted means is offered to the market on a spot basis and gives opportunities to generate incremental salary.
similar EBITDA for drinks Pipelines accelerated by means of $ninety nine million for the three months ended December 31, 2017 compared to the equal duration in 2016 and became the web effect of:
DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATIONDepreciation and amortization expanded by using $3 million for the three months ended December 31, 2017 compared to the equal length in 2016 because of the new amenities being positioned in-carrier, partly offset with the aid of the effect of a weaker U.S. dollar.
the following is a reconciliation of related EBITDA and similar EBIT (our non-GAAP measures) to segmented salary (the equivalent GAAP measure). definite prices previously stated in our corporate phase at the moment are being stated inside the company segments to more advantageous align with how we measure our financial efficiency. 2016 outcomes had been adjusted to reflect this trade.three months endedDecember 31 yr endedDecember 31 (unaudited – millions of $) 2017 2016 2017 2016 Canadian vigour Western Power1 23 26 a hundred 74 japanese energy92 eighty two 344 349 Bruce power120 83 434 293 Canadian power - similar EBITDA1,2 235 191 878 716 Depreciation and amortization (30 ) (26 ) (138 ) (one hundred forty five ) Canadian vigor - related EBIT1,2 205 a hundred sixty five 740 571 U.S. energy - similar EBITDA3 (US$) (8 ) seventy three one hundred 394 Depreciation and amortization4 — (eleven ) — (109 ) U.S. energy - comparable EBIT (8 ) sixty two 100 285 foreign change have an effect on (four ) 20 30 ninety two U.S. vigour - comparable EBIT (Cdn$) (12 ) 82 one hundred thirty 377 herbal gas Storage and other operations - comparable EBITDA 15 20 fifty five 58 Depreciation and amortization (three ) (3 ) (13 ) (12 ) natural gas Storage and different operations - related EBIT 12 17 42 46 enterprise building and different costs - comparable EBITDA and EBIT5 (24 ) (4 ) (33 ) (15 ) power - comparable EBIT 181 260 879 979 certain gadgets: gain on sale of Ontario solar property 127 — 127 — benefit/(loss) on income of U.S. Northeast vigour belongings 15 (839 ) 484 (844 ) Ravenswood goodwill impairment — — — (1,085 ) Alberta PPA terminations and contract — (92 ) — (332 ) chance management activities 149 ninety seven 62 125 Segmented earnings/(losses) 472 (574 ) 1,552 (1,157 )
1 covered losses from the Alberta PPAs as much as March 2016 when the PPAs had been terminated.2 comprises our share of fairness revenue from our investments in Portlands power and Bruce energy.3 TC Hydro salary protected as much as April 19, 2017 sale date; Ravenswood, Ironwood, Ocean State energy and Kibby Wind revenue covered up to June 2, 2017 sale date.4 Depreciation of U.S. Northeast vigour property ceased effective November 2016 when categorised as property held for sale.5 comprises a $21 million impairment can charge in fourth quarter 2017 of obsolete equipment.
power segmented salary multiplied by $1,046 million for the three months ended December 31, 2017 compared to the equal length in 2016 and protected the following selected objects:
The remainder of the energy segmented earnings are comparable to comparable EBIT together with comparable EBITDA.
Western PowerWestern power comparable EBITDA become constant for the three months ended December 31, 2017 compared to the identical period in 2016.
jap PowerEastern energy similar EBITDA multiplied through $10 million for the three months ended December 31, 2017 compared to the equal duration in 2016 specifically as a result of greater earnings from our wind facilities.
DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATIONDepreciation and amortization improved with the aid of $4 million essentially due to a 2016 adjustment related to the anticipated beneficial life of our cogeneration property, partly offset by way of the cessation of depreciation on our Ontario solar belongings upon classification as held on the market in October 2017.
Bruce PowerBruce vigor results replicate our proportionate share. here is our proportionate share of the accessories of related EBITDA and related EBIT.three months endedDecember 31 12 months endedDecember 31 (unaudited – tens of millions of $, unless in any other case cited) 2017 2016 2017 2016 equity salary covered in comparable EBITDA and EBIT made from: Revenues 414 382 1,626 1,491 operating fees (208 ) (212 ) (846 ) (870 ) Depreciation and other (86 ) (87 ) (346 ) (328 ) related EBITDA and comparable EBIT1 120 83 434 293 Bruce vigor – different suggestions Plant availability2 92 % eighty five % ninety % eighty three % deliberate outage days forty three eighty 221 415 Unplanned outage days 10 27 forty nine seventy six sales volumes (GWh)1 6,275 5,758 24,368 22,178 Realized earnings expense per MWh3 $67 $69 $sixty seven $sixty eight
1 Represents our forty eight.4 per cent (2016 - forty eight.5 per cent) ownership hobby in Bruce vigor. earnings volumes consist of deemed era.2 The percentage of time the plant turned into available to generate power, in spite of even if it changed into working.three Calculation in keeping with precise and deemed generation. Realized earnings expenditures per MWh contains realized positive aspects and losses from contracting actions and cost stream-via objects. Excludes unrealized beneficial properties and losses on contracting actions and non-electricity revenues.
Bruce energy comparable EBITDA extended via $37 million for the three months ended December 31, 2017 in comparison to the equal duration in 2016 specifically as a result of greater volumes as a consequence of fewer outage days.
U.S. POWERIn 2nd quarter 2017, we accomplished the sales of our U.S. power technology belongings and initiated the wind down of our U.S. energy advertising operations.
herbal gasoline STORAGE AND different OPERATINGNatural gasoline Storage related EBITDA lowered via $5 million for the three months ended December 31, 2017 compared to the equal length in 2016 peculiarly as a result of decrease realized natural gas storage fee spreads.
the following is a reconciliation of similar EBITDA and comparable EBIT (our non-GAAP measures) to segmented salary/(losses) (the equal GAAP measure). definite prices up to now reported in our corporate phase at the moment are being suggested inside the enterprise segments to more suitable align with how we measure our financial performance. 2016 effects were adjusted to replicate this exchange.three months endedDecember 31 year endedDecember 31 (unaudited - thousands and thousands of $) 2017 2016 2017 2016 related EBITDA and EBIT (1 ) eleven (21 ) 18 certain objects: Integration and acquisition related fees – Columbia — (36 ) (eighty one ) (116 ) foreign exchange benefit – inter-affiliate loan1 64 — 63 — Restructuring costs — (8 ) — (22 ) Segmented income/(losses) 63 (33 ) (39 ) (a hundred and twenty )
1 suggested in profits from fairness investments on the Condensed consolidated observation of revenue.
company segmented income were $sixty three million for the three months ended December 31, 2017 compared to a lack of $33 million for the same length in 2016 and blanketed here specific gadgets that have been excluded from similar EBIT:
related EBITDA diminished through $12 million for the three months ended December 31, 2017 compared to the equal duration in 2016 primarily due to multiplied normal and administrative prices.
different income observation objects
pastime costthree months endedDecember 31 year endedDecember 31 (unaudited - hundreds of thousands of $) 2017 2016 2017 2016 hobby on lengthy-time period debt and junior subordinated notes Canadian dollar-denominated (138 ) (109 ) (494 ) (452 ) U.S. dollar-denominated (315 ) (316 ) (1,269 ) (1,127 ) foreign exchange influence (86 ) (106 ) (379 ) (366 ) (539 ) (531 ) (2,142 ) (1,945 ) other hobby and amortization expense (25 ) (54 ) (99 ) (114 ) Capitalized interest23 forty three 173 176 hobby rate protected in similar earnings (541 ) (542 ) (2,068 ) (1,883 ) particular gadgets: Integration and acquisition related prices – Columbia — — — (a hundred and fifteen ) risk administration activities — — (1 ) — hobby price (541 ) (542 ) (2,069 ) (1,998 )
interest rate turned into constant for the three months ended December 31, 2017 in comparison to the identical period in 2016 and displays the web effect of:
Allowance for money used throughout developmentthree months endedDecember 31 yr endedDecember 31 (unaudited – thousands and thousands of $) 2017 2016 2017 2016 Canadian greenback-denominated 25 forty eight 174 181 U.S. dollar-denominated ninety one 32 259 181 overseas trade affect 24 17 74 fifty seven Allowance for money used all over building 140 ninety seven 507 419
AFUDC improved by means of $43 million for the three months ended December 31, 2017 in comparison to the equal length in 2016 essentially as a result of to persevered funding in and higher charges on tasks received as a part of the 2016 Columbia acquisition, as well as endured funding in Mexico projects, partly offset by means of the commercial in-carrier of Topolobampo, the completion of Mazatlán building and our determination no longer to proceed with the energy East Pipeline.
activity revenue and other(unaudited - millions of $) three months endedDecember 31 12 months endedDecember 31 2017 2016 2017 2016 pastime earnings and other covered in comparable income fifty six eight 159 71 specific gadgets: Integration and acquisition linked fees – Columbia — — — 6 international change loss – inter-affiliate mortgage (sixty four) — (63) — risk administration activities (1) (23) 88 26 activity profits and different (9) (15) 184 103
activity salary and different multiplied by way of $6 million for the three months ended December 31, 2017 in comparison to the equal period in 2016 as a result of the net effect of:
income tax ratethree months endedDecember 31 year endedDecember 31 (unaudited - thousands and thousands of $) 2017 2016 2017 2016 revenue tax rate protected in comparable revenue (234 ) (211 ) (839 ) (841 ) selected objects: U.S. Tax Reform adjustment 804 — 804 — power East impairment can charge 302 — 302 — net loss/(benefit) on earnings of U.S. Northeast energy belongings forty nine (31 ) (177 ) (29 ) benefit on sale of Ontario photo voltaic belongings 9 — 9 — Keystone XL asset costs 2 (3 ) 6 10 Integration and acquisition linked prices – Columbia — (22 ) 22 10 Keystone XL earnings tax recoveries — — 7 28 Ravenswood goodwill impairment — — — 429 Alberta PPA terminations — 24 — 88 Restructuring prices — 2 — 6 TC Offshore loss on sale — — — 1 possibility administration activities (62 ) (33 ) (45 ) (54 ) earnings tax recovery/(fee) 870 (274 ) 89 (352 )
salary tax fee protected in similar salary multiplied through $23 million for the three months ended December 31, 2017 compared to the same length in 2016 essentially due to a rise in comparable profits, adjustments in the share of salary earned between Canadian and international jurisdictions and adjustments in stream-through taxes in regulatory operations.
net income brought on by non-controlling hobbiesthree months ended year ended December 31 December 31 (unaudited - thousands and thousands of $) 2017 2016 2017 2016 net profits caused by non-controlling hobbies blanketed in related earnings (forty nine ) (70 ) (238 ) (257 ) particular items: Acquisition connected prices - Columbia — 2 — 5 web income as a result of non-controlling pastimes (forty nine ) (sixty eight ) (238 ) (252 )
web salary attributable to non-controlling hobbies lowered by way of $19 million, and $21 million as blanketed in comparable salary, for the three months ended December 31, 2017 in comparison to the identical duration in 2016 primarily because of the acquisition of the remaining extraordinary publicly held common units of CPPL in February 2017.
favourite share dividendsthree months ended year ended December 31 December 31 (unaudited - millions of $) 2017 2016 2017 2016 favored share dividends (40 ) (32 ) (one hundred sixty ) (109 )
preferred share dividends improved via $8 million for the three months ended December 31, 2017 in comparison to the same duration in 2016 basically as a result of the issuance of series 15 favorite shares in November 2016.similar DISTRIBUTABLE money flow three months ended yr ended December 31 December 31 (unaudited - tens of millions of $, except per share quantities) 2017 2016 2017 2016 net cash provided by using operations 1,390 1,575 5,230 5,069 raise/(lower) in operating working capital 49 (220 ) 273 (248 ) cash generated from operations1 1,439 1,355 5,503 4,821 selected objects: Integration and acquisition linked expenses - Columbia — forty five eighty four 283 Keystone XL asset expenses 11 15 34 52 U.S. Northeast energy disposition costs — 10 20 15 similar funds generated from operations1 1,450 1,425 5,641 5,171 Dividends on favorite shares (39 ) (26 ) (a hundred and fifty five ) (100 ) Distributions paid to non-controlling pastimes (68 ) (78 ) (283 ) (279 ) maintenance capital bills including equity investments - Recoverable in future tolls (541 ) (323 ) (1,364 ) (941 ) - different (seventy five ) (70 ) (240 ) (310 ) similar distributable cash flow1 - Reflecting all maintenance capital bills 727 928 3,599 three,541 - Reflecting most effective non-recoverable preservation capital charges 1,268 1,251 four,963 four,482 comparable distributable money movement per ordinary share1 - Reflecting all preservation capital fees $0.eighty three $1.12 $four.13 $4.sixty seven - Reflecting only non-recoverable renovation capital bills $1.forty five $1.50 $5.sixty nine $5.ninety one
1 See the non-GAAP measures area during this MD&A for additional discussion of funds generated from operations, related dollars generated from operations, similar distributable money flow and comparable distributable money stream per common share.
similar funds generated from operationsComparable cash generated from operations, a non-GAAP measure, extended $25 million for the three months ended December 31, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016 basically as a result of higher related salary.
comparable distributable money flowComparable distributable money stream, a non-GAAP measure, helps us examine the money attainable to usual shareholders before capital allocation.
The decrease in comparable distributable cash flow reflecting all upkeep capital costs for the three months ended December 31, 2017 in comparison to the same period in 2016 turned into essentially driven via the enhance in recoverable upkeep capital expenditures in Canadian and U.S. herbal fuel pipelines. comparable distributable cash circulate reflecting handiest non-recoverable upkeep capital costs is according to fourth quarter 2016. similar distributable money move per average share for the three months ended December 31, 2017 also contains the dilutive effect of normal shares issued in fourth quarter 2016 and 2017.
despite the fact we deduct protection capital fees in deciding upon related distributable cash circulate, we now have the ability to get better the majority of these charges in Canadian natural gas Pipelines, U.S. natural gas Pipelines and drinks Pipelines. Canadian natural fuel pipelines maintenance capital charges are mirrored in rate bases, on which we earn a regulated return and subsequently get better in tolls. nearly all of our U.S. natural gasoline pipelines can recover protection capital via tolls below present cost settlements, or have the potential to get well preservation capital via tolls centered in future price cases or settlements. Tolling arrangements in drinks Pipelines give for recovery of protection capital.
right here provides a breakdown of protection capital expenses:three months ended 12 months ended December 31 December 31 (unaudited - thousands and thousands of $) 2017 2016 2017 2016 Canadian natural gas Pipelines 301 133 601 323 U.S. natural gas Pipelines 237 182 749 586 liquids Pipelines eight 8 19 32 different 70 70 235 310 maintenance capital costs together with fairness investments 616 393 1,604 1,251
Reconciliation of non-GAAP measuresthree months endedDecember 31 12 months endedDecember 31 (unaudited - tens of millions of $) 2017 2016 2017 2016 similar EBITDA Canadian natural gas Pipelines 569 584 2,a hundred and forty four 2,182 U.S. herbal fuel Pipelines 604 570 2,357 1,682 Mexico natural gas Pipelines 116 119 519 332 drinks Pipelines 401 302 1,348 1,152 calories214 304 1,030 1,281 company (1 ) eleven (21 ) 18 related EBITDA 1,903 1,890 7,377 6,647 Depreciation and amortization (516 ) (514 ) (2,048 ) (1,939 ) similar EBIT 1,387 1,376 5,329 4,708 particular objects: energy East impairment can charge (1,256 ) — (1,256 ) — Integration and acquisition related charges – Columbia — (47 ) (91 ) (179 ) Keystone XL asset fees (11 ) (15 ) (34 ) (52 ) net profit/(loss) on income of U.S. Northeast vigor assets 15 (839 ) 484 (844 ) benefit on sale of Ontario photo voltaic belongings 127 — 127 — international exchange profit – inter-affiliate loan sixty four — 63 — Ravenswood goodwill impairment — — — (1,085 ) Alberta PPA terminations and settlement — (92 ) — (332 ) Restructuring prices — (8 ) — (22 ) TC Offshore loss on sale — — — (4 ) chance management actions 164 a hundred and one 62 123 Segmented profits 490 476 4,684 2,313
Condensed consolidated remark of profitsthree months endedDecember 31 yr endedDecember 31 (unaudited - hundreds of thousands of Canadian $, except per shareamounts) 2017 2016 2017 2016 Revenues Canadian herbal gas Pipelines 968 1,005 3,693 3,682 U.S. natural gasoline Pipelines 900 941 3,584 2,526 Mexico natural gas Pipelines 138 129 570 378 liquids Pipelines 599 463 2,009 1,755 energy 1,012 1,097 3,593 4,206 3,617 3,635 13,449 12,547 salary from equity Investments 246 159 773 514 operating and different fees Plant operating prices and other 944 1,189 3,906 three,861 Commodity purchases resold 671 544 2,382 2,172 Property taxes 127 a hundred and fifty 569 555 Depreciation and amortization 516 514 2,055 1,939 Goodwill and other asset impairment charges 1,257 ninety two 1,257 1,388 three,515 2,489 10,169 9,915 benefit/(Loss) on assets Held for sale/offered 142 (829 ) 631 (833 ) financial prices activity fee 541 542 2,069 1,998 Allowance for money used throughout development (140 ) (97 ) (507 ) (419 ) pastime salary and other 9 15 (184 ) (103 ) 410 460 1,378 1,476 income before profits Taxes eighty sixteen 3,306 837 earnings Tax (healing)/fee latest 21 53 149 156 Deferred (87 ) 221 566 196 Deferred - U.S. Tax Reform (804 ) — (804 ) — (870 ) 274 (89 ) 352 web income/(Loss) 950 (258 ) three,395 485 web salary because of non-controlling pastimes forty nine sixty eight 238 252 internet salary/(Loss)as a result of Controlling hobbies 901 (326 ) three,157 233 favored share dividends forty 32 160 109 web income/(Loss) because of commonplace Shares 861 (358 ) 2,997 124 net income/(Loss) per regular Share fundamental $0.98 ($0.43 ) $3.forty four $0.sixteen Diluted $0.ninety eight ($0.43 ) $three.43 $0.16 Dividends Declared per typical Share $0.625 $0.565 $2.50 $2.26 Weighted common variety of general Shares (thousands and thousands) fundamental 877 832 872 759 Diluted 879 833 874 760
Condensed consolidated commentary of money flowsthree months endedDecember 31 yr endedDecember 31 (unaudited - millions of Canadian $) 2017 2016 2017 2016 money Generated from Operations net income/(loss) 950 (258 ) three,395 485 Depreciation and amortization 516 514 2,055 1,939 Goodwill and other asset impairment fees 1,257 92 1,257 1,388 Deferred income taxes (87 ) 221 566 196 Deferred income taxes - U.S. Tax Reform (804 ) — (804 ) — revenue from fairness investments (246 ) (159 ) (773 ) (514 ) Distributions got from operating actions of equity investments 227 219 970 844 employee submit-retirement benefits funding, net of cost — 2 (64 ) (three ) (benefit)/loss on assets held on the market/bought (142 ) 829 (631 ) 833 fairness allowance for cash used right through construction (113 ) (fifty eight ) (362 ) (253 ) Unrealized features on fiscal instruments (163 ) (seventy eight ) (149 ) (149 ) different 44 31 forty three 55 (increase)/lessen in operating working capital (49 ) 220 (273 ) 248 net cash supplied via operations 1,390 1,575 5,230 5,069 Investing actions Capital charges (2,000 ) (1,745 ) (7,383 ) (5,007 ) Capital tasks in construction (11 ) (76 ) (146 ) (295 ) Contributions to fairness investments (541 ) (195 ) (1,681 ) (765 ) Acquisitions, net of money bought — — — (13,608 ) Proceeds from income of assets, web of transaction charges 1,170 — 5,317 6 other distributions from equity investments — 2 362 727 Deferred amounts and other (eighty one ) 141 (168 ) 159 web money used in investing activities (1,463 ) (1,873 ) (three,699 ) (18,783 ) Financing activities Notes payable (repaid)/issued, web (194 ) (229 ) 1,038 (329 ) lengthy-time period debt issued, web of problem charges 1,675 — three,643 12,333 lengthy-time period debt repaid (1,570 ) (four,810 ) (7,085 ) (7,153 ) Junior subordinated notes issued, internet of situation costs — (2 ) 3,468 1,549 Dividends on general shares (357 ) (277 ) (1,339 ) (1,436 ) Dividends on favourite shares (39 ) (26 ) (one hundred fifty five ) (one hundred ) Distributions paid to non-controlling hobbies (68 ) (seventy eight ) (283 ) (279 ) typical shares issued, internet of challenge charges 232 three,410 274 7,747 normal shares repurchased — — — (14 ) favourite shares issued, internet of problem fees — 982 — 1,474 Partnership gadgets of TC PipeLines, LP issued, internet of challenge fees sixty three sixty four 225 215 standard gadgets of Columbia Pipeline partners LP bought — — (1,205 ) — net money (utilized in)/offered by financing activities (258 ) (966 ) (1,419 ) 14,007 impact of overseas alternate expense alterations on money and money Equivalents (four ) — (39 ) (127 ) (lessen)/raise in money and cash Equivalents (335 ) (1,264 ) 73 166 money and cash Equivalents starting of duration 1,424 2,280 1,016 850 cash and money Equivalents conclusion of period 1,089 1,016 1,089 1,016
Condensed consolidated balance sheet(unaudited - hundreds of thousands of Canadian $) December 31,2017 December 31,2016 ASSETSCurrent belongings cash and money equivalents 1,089 1,016 debts receivable 2,522 2,075 Inventories 378 368 property held for sale — 3,717 other 691 908 four,680 8,084 Plant, Property and device net of collected depreciation of $23,734 and$22,288, respectively 57,277 54,475 equity Investments 6,366 6,544 Regulatory property 1,376 1,322 Goodwill 13,084 13,958 personal loan Receivable from Affiliate 919 — Intangible and different property 1,484 3,026 restrained Investments 915 642 86,one hundred and one 88,051 LIABILITIES latest Liabilities Notes payable 1,763 774 accounts payable and other 4,057 three,861 Dividends payable 586 526 amassed interest 605 595 Liabilities concerning property held on the market — 86 latest element of long-time period debt 2,866 1,838 9,877 7,680 Regulatory Liabilities four,321 2,121 other lengthy-time period Liabilities 727 1,183 Deferred profits Tax Liabilities 5,403 7,662 lengthy-term Debt 31,875 38,312 Junior Subordinated Notes 7,007 three,931 59,210 60,889 general instruments discipline to Rescission or Redemption — 1,179 equity commonplace shares, no par cost 21,167 20,099 Issued and stunning: December 31, 2017 - 881 million shares December 31, 2016 - 864 million shares favored shares 3,980 3,980 extra paid-in capital — — Retained revenue 1,623 1,138 accrued other comprehensive loss (1,731 ) (960 ) Controlling pastimes 25,039 24,257 Non-controlling interests 1,852 1,726 26,891 25,983 86,one zero one 88,051
Segmented assistanceCanadian U.S. Mexico three months ended December 31, 2017 herbal natural herbal gas gasoline fuel liquids (unaudited - millions of Canadian $) Pipelines Pipelines Pipelines Pipelines power Corporate1 complete revenues968 900 138 599 1,012 — 3,617 Intersegment revenues — 20 — — — (20 ) — 968 920 138 599 1,012 (20 ) 3,617 profits (loss) from equity investments 2 65 (9 ) (6 ) one hundred thirty sixty four 2 246 Plant operating costs and different (342 ) (336 ) (13 ) (186 ) (86 ) 19 (944 ) Commodity purchases resold — — — — (671 ) — (671 ) Property taxes (fifty nine ) (forty five ) — (22 ) (1 ) — (127 ) Depreciation and amortization (236 ) (143 ) (23 ) (eighty one ) (33 ) — (516 ) Goodwill and other asset impairment costs — — — (1,236 ) (21 ) — (1,257 ) gain on sale of belongings — — — — 142 — 142 Segmented salary/(losses) 333 461 93 (932 ) 472 sixty three 490 pastime fee (541 ) Allowance for money used during development a hundred and forty pastime revenue and other (9 ) earnings earlier than earnings taxes 80 profits tax healing 870 internet profits 950 net income because of non-controlling pastimes (49 ) net revenue caused by controlling interests 901 favored share dividends (40 ) internet salary attributable to ordinary shares 861
1 The business statistics intersegment earnings at reduced in size prices. For segmented reporting, these transactions are included as revenues in the segment presenting the provider, as fees within the phase receiving the carrier and are eradicated on consolidation within the company segment. Intersegment profit is diagnosed when the product or carrier has been offered to 3rd parties.2 This revenue from fairness investments pertains to foreign alternate gains on the company's inter-affiliate loan with Sur de Texas. The peso-denominated mortgage to the Sur de Texas three way partnership represents the company's proportionate share of debt financing for this three way partnership.Canadian U.S. Mexico three months ended December 31, 2016 natural herbal natural fuel fuel gasoline drinks (unaudited - hundreds of thousands of Canadian $) Pipelines Pipelines Pipelines Pipelines power Corporate1 total revenues1,005 941 129 463 1,097 — three,635 Intersegment salary — 11 — — — (eleven ) — 1,005 952 129 463 1,097 (eleven ) 3,635 profits/(loss) from equity investments 3 64 (1 ) — ninety three — 159 Plant working fees and different (359 ) (415 ) (9 ) (151 ) (233 ) (22 ) (1,189 ) Commodity purchases resold — — — — (544 ) — (544 ) Property taxes (sixty five ) (42 ) — (21 ) (22 ) — (150 ) Depreciation and amortization (220 ) (156 ) (16 ) (seventy eight ) (44 ) — (514 ) Asset impairment expenses — — — — (ninety two ) — (ninety two ) Loss on sale of property — — — — (829 ) — (eighty two ) Segmented revenue/(losses) 364 403 103 213 (574 ) (33 ) 476 pastime rate (542 ) Allowance for dollars used all over development 97 interest revenue and different (15 ) Loss before earnings taxes 16 income tax healing (274 ) internet loss (258 ) internet earnings caused by non-controlling interests (sixty eight ) web loss attributable to controlling interests (326 ) favorite share dividends (32 ) web loss as a result of common shares (358 )
1 The enterprise information intersegment sales at reduced in size prices. For segmented reporting, these transactions are covered as revenues within the section providing the carrier, as fees within the section receiving the provider and are eradicated on consolidation in the corporate section. Intersegment earnings is identified when the product or service has been provided to 3rd events.Canadian U.S. Mexico yr ended December 31, 2017 herbal herbal herbal gasoline gasoline gas drinks (unaudited - hundreds of thousands of Canadian $) Pipelines Pipelines Pipelines Pipelines power Corporate1 complete revenues3,693 3,584 570 2,009 3,593 — 13,449 Intersegment revenues — fifty one — — — (fifty one ) — three,693 three,635 570 2,009 three,593 (51 ) 13,449 salary/(loss) from fairness investments eleven 240 (9 ) (3 ) 471 63 2 773 Plant operating expenses and different (1,300 ) (1,340 ) (forty two ) (623 ) (550 ) (fifty one ) (three,906 ) Commodity purchases resold — — — — (2,382 ) — (2,382 ) Property taxes (260 ) (181 ) — (89 ) (39 ) — (569 ) Depreciation and amortization (908 ) (594 ) (ninety three ) (309 ) (151 ) — (2,055 ) Goodwill and different asset impairment fees — — — (1,236 ) (21 ) — (1,257 ) gain on belongings held for sale/sold — — — — 631 — 631 Segmented salary/(losses) 1,236 1,760 426 (251 ) 1,552 (39 ) four,684 pastime cost (2,069 ) Allowance for cash used all the way through construction 507 hobby income and different 184 profits earlier than income taxes three,306 salary tax recovery 89 net revenue three,395 web earnings attributable to non-controlling interests (238 ) internet salary attributable to controlling pastimes 3,157 favorite share dividends (a hundred and sixty ) web salary as a result of regular shares 2,997
1 The business information intersegment revenue at contracted quotes. For segmented reporting, these transactions are included as revenues within the section providing the service, as prices within the phase receiving the carrier and are eradicated on consolidation within the company segment. Intersegment profit is recognized when the product or provider has been provided to third parties.2 This revenue from fairness investments pertains to overseas change features on the business's inter-affiliate personal loan with Sur de Texas. The peso-denominated personal loan to the Sur de Texas joint venture represents the enterprise's proportionate share of debt financing for this joint venture.Canadian U.S. Mexico year ended December 31, 2016 herbal natural natural gas fuel fuel beverages (unaudited - hundreds of thousands of Canadian $) Pipelines Pipelines Pipelines Pipelines power Corporate1 total revenuesthree,682 2,526 378 1,755 4,206 — 12,547 Intersegment revenues — 56 — — — (56 ) — three,682 2,582 378 1,755 4,206 (fifty six ) 12,547 profits/(loss) from fairness investments 12 214 (three ) (1 ) 292 — 514 Plant working costs and other (1,245 ) (1,057 ) (43 ) (568 ) (884 ) (64 ) (three,861 ) Commodity purchases resold — — — — (2,172 ) — (2,172 ) Property taxes (267 ) (one hundred twenty ) — (88 ) (80 ) — (555 ) Depreciation and amortization (875 ) (425 ) (45 ) (292 ) (302 ) — (1,939 ) Asset impairment prices — — — — (1,388 ) — (1,388 ) Loss on sale of assets — (four ) — — (829 ) — (833 ) Segmented revenue/(losses) 1,307 1,one hundred ninety 287 806 (1,157 ) (one hundred twenty ) 2,313 pastime rate (1,998 ) Allowance for cash used all over development 419 activity profits and other 103 salary earlier than profits taxes 837 income tax cost (352 ) internet revenue 485 net income as a result of non-controlling pastimes (252 ) web income attributable to controlling interests 233 favourite share dividends (109 ) internet salary brought on by standard shares 124
1 The enterprise statistics intersegment revenue at shriveled charges. For segmented reporting, these transactions are blanketed as revenues in the phase providing the provider, as expenses within the segment receiving the carrier and are eliminated on consolidation within the corporate phase. Intersegment income is recognized when the product or service has been supplied to 3rd events.
complete assets(unaudited - tens of millions of Canadian $) December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016 Canadian natural fuel Pipelines sixteen,904 15,816 U.S. herbal gas Pipelines 35,898 34,422 Mexico natural fuel Pipelines 5,716 5,013 beverages Pipelines 15,438 16,896 calories8,503 13,169 corporate three,642 2,735 86,101 88,051
3COM [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
AccessData [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACFE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Acme-Packet [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACSM [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Admission-Tests [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
ADOBE [92 Certification Exam(s) ]
AFP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
AICPA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
AIIM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Alcatel-Lucent [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Alfresco [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Altiris [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Amazon [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
American-College [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Android [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
APA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
APC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
APICS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Apple [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
AppSense [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
APTUSC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Arizona-Education [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ARM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Aruba [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASIS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASQ [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASTQB [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
Autodesk [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Avaya [95 Certification Exam(s) ]
Axis [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Banking [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
BEA [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
BICSI [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
BlackBerry [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
BlueCoat [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Brocade [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Business-Objects [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
Business-Tests [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
CA-Technologies [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
Certification-Board [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Certiport [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
CheckPoint [40 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIPS [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cisco [315 Certification Exam(s) ]
Citrix [46 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIW [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cloudera [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cognos [19 Certification Exam(s) ]
College-Board [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
CompTIA [74 Certification Exam(s) ]
ComputerAssociates [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
CPP-Institute [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CSP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CWNA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CWNP [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Dassault [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
DELL [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
DMI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ECCouncil [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
ECDL [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
EMC [127 Certification Exam(s) ]
Enterasys [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Ericsson [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
Esri [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
ExamExpress [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Exin [40 Certification Exam(s) ]
ExtremeNetworks [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
F5-Networks [20 Certification Exam(s) ]
FCTC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Filemaker [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Financial [36 Certification Exam(s) ]
Fortinet [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
Foundry [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Fujitsu [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
GAQM [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
Genesys [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
GIAC [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Google [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
GuidanceSoftware [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
H3C [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
HDI [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Healthcare [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
HIPAA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hitachi [28 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hortonworks [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hospitality [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
HP [743 Certification Exam(s) ]
HR [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
HRCI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Huawei [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hyperion [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
IAAP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IBM [1520 Certification Exam(s) ]
IBQH [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ICAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ICDL [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
IEEE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IELTS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IFPUG [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
IIBA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
IISFA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Intel [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
IQN [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IRS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISACA [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISC2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISEB [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
Isilon [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISM [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
iSQI [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
ITEC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Juniper [63 Certification Exam(s) ]
Legato [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
Liferay [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Lotus [66 Certification Exam(s) ]
LPI [23 Certification Exam(s) ]
LSI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Magento [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Maintenance [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
McAfee [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
McData [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Medical [25 Certification Exam(s) ]
Microsoft [362 Certification Exam(s) ]
Mile2 [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Military [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Misc [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Motorola [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
mySQL [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCLEX [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Network-General [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
NetworkAppliance [36 Certification Exam(s) ]
NI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NIELIT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Nokia [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Nortel [130 Certification Exam(s) ]
Novell [37 Certification Exam(s) ]
OMG [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Oracle [262 Certification Exam(s) ]
P&C [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Palo-Alto [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
PARCC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PayPal [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Pegasystems [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
PEOPLECERT [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
PMI [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Polycom [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
PostgreSQL-CE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Prince2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
PRMIA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PsychCorp [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PTCB [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
QAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
QlikView [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Quality-Assurance [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
RACC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Real-Estate [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
RedHat [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
RES [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
Riverbed [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
RSA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Sair [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
Salesforce [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
SANS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SAP [98 Certification Exam(s) ]
SASInstitute [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
SAT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SCO [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
SCP [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
SDI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
See-Beyond [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Siemens [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Snia [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
SOA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Social-Work-Board [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SpringSource [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SUN [63 Certification Exam(s) ]
SUSE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Sybase [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
Symantec [133 Certification Exam(s) ]
Teacher-Certification [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
The-Open-Group [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
TIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Tibco [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
Trend [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
TruSecure [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
USMLE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
VCE [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Veeam [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Veritas [32 Certification Exam(s) ]
Vmware [57 Certification Exam(s) ]
Wonderlic [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Worldatwork [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
XML-Master [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Zend [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Dropmark : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/12079966
Dropmark-Text : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/12929780
Blogspot : http://killexamsbraindump.blogspot.com/2018/01/look-at-these-920-138-real-question-and.html
Wordpress : https://wp.me/p7SJ6L-2CQ
Box.net : https://app.box.com/s/krqznmvjxceo3tvw9pzqnii98fme6f3n